From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction?
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:54:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw2-COXcuMQDg+Bsjojp5oVtpn0osU3dcFHKZK-1GQTNZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E88B5AE.70705@orlitzky.com>
>> I think separate repositories would only be necessary when using
>> distributed version control (git) as opposed to centralized
>> (subversion). I think subversion's path-based authorization should
>> eliminate the need for separate repositories?
>>
>
> Separate repos aren't strictly necessary, but it's much harder to verify
> your path permissions than it is to verify that your repositories are
> separate.
>
> The first involves config files and cascading information; the second
> involves being able to count to two =)
Would multiple repos work in a scenario where different developers
have access to different stuff and some stuff should be accessible to
multiple devs? I don't think you want the same stuff in more than one
repo. It seems like managing multiple repos would get out of hand in
that sort of situation and I might be better off with config files and
a single repo.
- Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-26 20:01 [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction? Grant
2011-09-26 21:37 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-09-27 11:27 ` Mick
2011-09-29 1:18 ` Grant
2011-09-29 2:23 ` Grant
2011-09-29 6:57 ` Jonas de Buhr
2011-09-29 7:32 ` Mick
2011-09-30 23:53 ` Grant
2011-10-01 11:07 ` Florian Philipp
2011-10-01 23:27 ` Grant
2011-10-02 22:41 ` Mick
2011-10-03 22:01 ` Grant
2011-10-03 22:12 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-29 8:13 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-29 17:23 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-09-30 23:59 ` Grant
2011-10-01 0:23 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-10-01 23:46 ` Grant
2011-10-02 19:04 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-10-03 21:54 ` Grant [this message]
2011-10-03 22:00 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-04 4:25 ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-09-27 12:19 ` Jonas de Buhr
2011-09-29 1:23 ` Grant
2011-09-29 6:43 ` Jonas de Buhr
2011-09-30 23:50 ` Grant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-01 5:58 Pandu Poluan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN0CFw2-COXcuMQDg+Bsjojp5oVtpn0osU3dcFHKZK-1GQTNZA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox