From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138674-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SYWuL-0002nf-W8
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 May 2012 06:24:54 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C94DAE0850;
Sun, 27 May 2012 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1C0E07AB
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 May 2012 06:22:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbuo19 with SMTP id uo19so4345774obb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=r/Rpyoou19IPEfY3LICKlv3/9zmD+YpNkQLJXH+fy5E=;
b=Wa3LjDHHI5ZkIevtRgITqNIqvHZXAE3ASJUPTWt4kDuCQU0437wP8Q3fatFdXDLomq
sL2Q0DCWf0fPFI6Pv9Uxte+DlGl11Z1DTll/JBUcsOGPLYPOb4Ha0Xj6Wf56/SLLHI2Q
AGWZ5rHOea7iuemqum5AzhulBrQfOI5Wl7vg/XZ1ZsnTvATYaDhjZCDbE+1ut2jekRZf
2nFd0sHVj1eKGVaCWq2ZruBTWPngmpx/7iNUpNMsTIUzuV8CCLvjUlJ0pSg2SqTEkAe7
/qLjXAt8523N62w5Z21peAe746sIZ17itFMOhv+08X0BiVWA6frB/xyJN6XfJx2vKNzn
wIUA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.14.36 with SMTP id m4mr4160564oec.12.1338099742887; Sat, 26
May 2012 23:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.113.3 with HTTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FC0C217.6050302@binarywings.net>
References: <CAN0CFw2e2BWFtm72qk1T1DAiA=5s_hYH9K2MYc0tuT_aFCipQw@mail.gmail.com>
<4FC0C217.6050302@binarywings.net>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 23:22:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw1bafR3G0QYYyprjUv63O-ymNAORqFsR508uzwyND2hsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} hire a programmer or company?
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6faaa07a-2ff1-4e1d-91ab-c297f55053a5
X-Archives-Hash: b4b0170698449bcce6a657129e372cab
>> I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
>> or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. =A0It makes sense from
>> a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
>> there are benefits to hiring a really good company.
>>
>> I'm sorry this is OT, but I bet you guys have some seriously good
>> insight on this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Grant
>>
>
> For starters, you could give us a bit more insight into the kind of
> project we are talking about. What's the expected development effort,
> what are the services you pay for (binaries, source code, testing,
> maintenance, ...)?
The project is made up of various and ongoing scripting tasks for a
relatively complex website.
> Regarding programmer vs. company, I'd say it depends on what you expect
> and pay for. If you just want it coded, then the lone programmer is
> probably as good as the company (since programming itself doesn't really
> scale well with the number of devs).
That's a really good point.
> Extensive testing, on the other hand, is something a team should do.
> Sure, the lone programmer can write you some unit tests and conduct a
> system test, but testing itself is a profession of its own and should be
> done by a second person with the relevant training.
>
> But in the end, these issues a minor. It really boils down to whom you
> trust more. Ask for references, look at their previous work, talk to
> them, etc.
Can you tell me what sort of positive and negative things to watch out for?
> All things being equal, paying 1*x instead of 2*x gives you the chance
> to pay another 1*x to a second developer if things don't work out with
> the first one. ;-)
Once I need more than one developer (which could come sooner rather
than later due to the availability of these guys) am I likely to
struggle managing them? I've read a bit about "Agile" software
development and I plan to read a lot more. Is that the way to go?
Would hiring a company make management a non-issue from my perspective?
- Grant
> Regards,
> Florian Philipp