From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: TCP Queuing problem
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:38:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw1KXZgx_PFDHhw9PsHADtQTOwcJawddOc9NtNsY3qDbCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0CFw1iVY=d5Yvy1PPxr+CkMBSQ0vOtR_1XgkxgEpMqm89HsA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1598 bytes --]
>>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
>>> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
>>> Queuing". It looks like I normally have about 400 packets per second
>>> graphed as "direct copy from queue" in munin throughout the day, but 2
>>> to 3.5 times that many are periodically graphed during work hours. I
>>> don't see the same pattern at all from the graph of all traffic on my
>>> network interface which actually peaks over the weekend. TCP Queuing
>>> doesn't rise above 400 packets per second all weekend. This is
>>> consistent week after week.
>>>
>>> My two employees come into work during the hours in question, and they
>>> certainly make frequent requests of the web server while at work, but
>>> if their volume of requests were the cause of the problem then that
>>> would be reflected in the graph of web server requests but it is not.
>>> I do run a small MTU on the systems at work due to the config of the
>>> modem/router we have there.
>>>
>>> Is this a recognizable problem to anyone?
>>
>>
>> I'm in the midst of this. Are there certain attacks I should check for?
>
>
> It looks like the TCP Queuing spike itself was due to imapproxy which
> I've now disabled. I'll post more info as I gather it.
imapproxy was clearly affecting the TCP Queuing graph in munin but I
still ended up with a massive TCP Queuing spike today and
corresponding http response time issues long after I disabled
imapproxy. Graph attached. I'm puzzled.
- Grant
[-- Attachment #2: TCPQueueing.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 38661 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-17 21:13 [gentoo-user] TCP Queuing problem Grant
2016-09-19 17:23 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant
2016-09-19 21:25 ` Grant
2016-09-20 0:38 ` Grant [this message]
2016-09-20 13:08 ` Grant
2016-09-21 4:01 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 14:30 ` Grant
2016-09-21 19:29 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 19:37 ` Grant
2016-09-21 20:06 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 20:28 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 19:41 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 19:53 ` Grant
2016-09-21 20:18 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-21 20:47 ` Grant
2016-09-21 21:44 ` Michael Mol
2016-09-22 0:30 ` Grant
2016-09-22 7:06 ` Kai Krakow
2016-09-25 0:25 ` Grant
2016-10-01 9:57 ` Grant
2016-09-20 13:50 ` J. Roeleveld
2016-09-20 14:53 ` Grant
2016-09-20 18:06 ` J. Roeleveld
2016-09-20 19:52 ` Grant
2016-09-20 20:19 ` Alarig Le Lay
2016-09-22 16:58 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN0CFw1KXZgx_PFDHhw9PsHADtQTOwcJawddOc9NtNsY3qDbCw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox