From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Managing multiple systems with identical hardware
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 03:37:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw1JTGPt7B5DEHsX=20jbEU9E0urL2VaveGon9jA0q1G-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52449C1A.5000306@gmail.com>
>> I realized I only need two types of systems in my life. One hosted
>> server and bunch of identical laptops. My laptop, my wife's laptop,
>> our HTPC, routers, and office workstations could all be on identical
>> hardware, and what better choice than a laptop? Extremely
>> space-efficient, portable, built-in UPS (battery), and no need to buy
>> a separate monitor, keyboard, mouse, speakers, camera, etc. Some
>> systems will use all of that stuff and some will use none, but it's
>> OK, laptops are getting cheap, and keyboard/mouse/video comes in handy
>> once in a while on any system.
>
> Laptops are a good choice, desktops are almost dead out there, and thin
> clients nettops are just dead in the water for anything other than
> appliances and media servers
>
>> What if my laptop is the master system and I install any application
>> that any of the other laptops need on my laptop and push its entire
>> install to all of the other laptops via rsync whenever it changes?
>> The only things that would vary by laptop would be users and
>> configuration.
>
> Could work, but don't push *your* laptop's config to all the other
> laptops. they end up with your stuff which might not be what them to
> have. Rather have a completely separate area where you store portage
> configs, tree, packages and distfiles for laptops/clients and push from
> there.
I actually do want them all to have my stuff and I want to have all
their stuff. That way everything is in sync and I can manage all of
them by just managing mine and pushing. How about pushing only
portage configs and then letting each of them emerge unattended? I
know unattended emerges are the kiss of death but if all of the
identical laptops have the same portage config and I emerge everything
successfully on my own laptop first, the unattended emerges should be
fine.
> I'd recommend if you have a decent-ish desktop lying around, you press
> that into service as your master build host. yeah, it takes 10% longer
> to build stuff, but so what? Do it overnight.
Well, my goal is to minimize the number of different systems I
maintain. Hopefully just one type of laptop and a server.
>> Maybe puppet could help with that? It would almost be
>> like my own distro. Some laptops would have stuff installed that they
>> don't need but at least they aren't running Fedora! :)
>
> DO NOT PROVISION GENTOO SYSTEMS FROM PUPPET.
OK, I'm thinking over how much variation there would be from laptop to laptop:
1. /etc/runlevels/default/* would vary of course.
2. /etc/conf.d/net would vary for the routers and my laptop which I
sometimes use as a router.
3. /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf under the same conditions as #2.
4. Users and /home would vary but the office workstations could all be
identical in this regard.
Am I missing anything? I can imagine everything else being totally identical.
What could I use to manage these differences?
> Rather keep your laptop as your laptop with it's own setup, and
> everything else as that own setup. You only need one small difference
> between what you want your laptop to have, and everything else to have,
> to crash that entire model.
I think it will work if I can find a way to manage the few differences
above. Am I overlooking any potential issues?
- Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 21:18 [gentoo-user] Managing multiple systems with identical hardware Grant
2013-09-25 21:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-26 9:08 ` Grant
2013-09-26 20:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-27 4:33 ` Johann Schmitz
2013-09-27 5:34 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-27 10:37 ` Grant [this message]
2013-09-27 19:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-27 20:30 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2013-09-29 18:36 ` Grant
2013-09-29 20:39 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-29 18:31 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant
2013-09-29 19:06 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-09-29 20:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-30 17:31 ` Grant
2013-09-30 19:28 ` thegeezer
2013-09-30 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-30 19:53 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2013-10-01 6:19 ` Grant
2013-10-01 14:04 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-10-01 15:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-09-30 21:02 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-10-01 6:26 ` Grant
2013-10-01 6:07 ` Grant
2013-10-01 6:20 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-10-02 18:54 ` Grant
2013-12-12 23:54 ` Grant
2013-12-13 0:16 ` Poison BL.
2013-12-13 0:34 ` wraeth
2013-12-13 2:06 ` Grant
2013-12-13 9:12 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-12-13 1:49 ` Grant
2013-12-13 7:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-12-13 9:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-12-13 7:52 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-10-01 7:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2013-10-01 18:37 ` joost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN0CFw1JTGPt7B5DEHsX=20jbEU9E0urL2VaveGon9jA0q1G-g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox