From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo on a Dell XPS 13 Ultrabook
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:56:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw1GPQ5ooEYJRuL0o_wsq8ED+d7WwrK-2cx+rZe-uHmgjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2H+eeHe_xjC=5+6wJxG9VJdrkPaeDcoQrgpxFtOUNp+4tASw@mail.gmail.com>
>> [snip]
>>>> 1. fdisk won't let me specify a start block before 2048 even though I
>>>> deleted all partitions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's normal. It's a long story, but Windows Vista and Windows 7 expects
>>> the first partition to start at sector 2048.
>>>
>>> You can force a lower number by toggling "DOS compatibility"; this should
>>> let you start the first partition as low as sector 63.
>>>
>>> HOWEVER, make sure that all partitions begin at multiples of 8 (e.g., 64,
>>> 72, 80, and so on); this will save you a lot of grief if it happens that the
>>> hard disk you're using has 4KiB-sectors.
>>
>> I just looked up the start block for my other systems and they're all
>> on 63. Is performance impacted on all of these systems since they
>> aren't started on 64?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>
> The performance is only impacted if the sector size is something other
> than 512 bytes. The newer 4K sector size used by some higher density
> drives requires that you start partitions on a sector boundary or they
> will perform badly. There isn't an actually performance need to
> actually start on 2048 but the fdisk-type developer folks are doing
> that to be more compatible with newer Windows installations.
All my drives says this from fdisk:
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
So it doesn't matter where the first partition starts?
- Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-04 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 2:12 [gentoo-user] Gentoo on a Dell XPS 13 Ultrabook Grant
2012-03-02 8:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-02 20:29 ` Grant
2012-03-02 23:03 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-03-02 23:35 ` Grant
2012-03-02 23:05 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-03-02 23:39 ` Grant
2012-03-03 17:50 ` Grant
2012-03-03 18:13 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-03 18:15 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-03 18:22 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-03 18:24 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-03 20:12 ` Joshua Murphy
2012-03-04 20:12 ` Grant
2012-03-04 20:34 ` Alex Schuster
2012-03-05 1:53 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-05 13:40 ` Alex Schuster
2012-03-05 1:58 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-04 20:02 ` Grant
2012-03-04 20:06 ` Grant
2012-03-04 21:09 ` Grant
2012-03-04 21:45 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-04 21:56 ` Grant [this message]
2012-03-04 22:07 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-04 22:36 ` Grant
2012-03-05 2:19 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-05 2:12 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-05 2:06 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-05 21:41 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-05 16:00 ` Alex Schuster
2012-03-05 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-05 20:17 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-05 21:33 ` Joshua Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN0CFw1GPQ5ooEYJRuL0o_wsq8ED+d7WwrK-2cx+rZe-uHmgjg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox