From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719081381F3 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BEF0E0F40; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F53EE0F27 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k14so1748103wgh.25 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Zm4cYMYZ103AiTrjilXRg6KzTt7O5tChri2le2FZbDo=; b=fA8+o/WBYJXnYhxosulhqAJ1M6o9zw1JsTkphzU1JY1ZNLXvn8ER4v5+6J9HR81LtR G1O7LwldV5TjTle1gpK4kbuWJ4T+4kC4W6NZccSJmbAp3MLkIy1cNyHTB3ihcBwr3EXX galQRcl09OqoSRu8Obnn3PUr1lEi583hN0CBR+vWqK4lkkbBlmUNtM3jU+i77iVlcioS SslgBAFdZYBUp0Syh+WBASBoJs8L67WWIbgHPfgXplCnubPY1dNptfYzT/AyD5lz91mX D1lyjNMorVBpv5tpVynSX4mjLEA0WFT3B2apaiXPvjXuZarz1xIbnZVy+IpwVibFE05Z z4Tg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.137 with SMTP id em9mr6302977wic.56.1378387932651; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.93.199 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 06:32:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] {OT} image metadata and privacy From: Grant To: Gentoo mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b25ccb0e-733a-4e15-af52-4aacdad306aa X-Archives-Hash: 3551da9f9d9d28418d9970f3cf358d32 Has anyone found a way to completely sanitize images of all potentially privacy-invading metadata for posting online? I recently discovered that there is actually an EXIF thumbnail image. So if you have a photo and you crop it and post it online, the EXIF thumbnail of the original uncropped image is still there for all to see. - Grant