From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150760-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADD71381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:11:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCC5AE0C84;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:11:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com (mail-qc0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBFEE0C30
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:11:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p19so4187529qcv.39
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=fMquyReCtaBBtVt2w5S9CAqum2Qjd6uEtEaN2jTXhTk=;
        b=DQkERbGpPUGYRMXq3712Fp7TvHiS8hiJp93XmiZwcLz48iJr+wlU9J/Hr9qyxCsbrm
         lUDGSD8POsAf5rQN04XnnqxgZwa+02c/h6tEf39tKF6dKI5ELukoSzZgPtxNTl0lmbnT
         uyjn118zrGvszR0SNKSCUR5OjjO+5hNgBYQ5AbzThP91Sz9dPN7M2Jne5W/B7hwzAaoI
         nAkw1F+VGUNZyPgyPOu8VZouwOA6FdblF1XZD4IaCun7Y9Xp+Kt6ctKBmSzgwZKkwmYJ
         MUFpEGegfHszv4+y4A87Mecarz8AYbDVSQJd2l4AT67FQFiRi569ZlSDNZQGyF1DUYJ1
         Y2tg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.62.137 with SMTP id y9mr57266641qer.59.1379477497909;
 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.25.83 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52389754.60700@xunil.at>
References: <CAN0CFw1nGVZxJGGsq4TZidEPuyLDkcD0oYRDOOfNzFFM2vQ-tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52382CA4.6090407@libertytrek.org>
	<CAN0CFw1jTNV4DZ21gTLHo9wCe=6LTkpXU92hpzhiw_Za3L=Ksw@mail.gmail.com>
	<523872B7.5040302@orlitzky.com>
	<523877D3.9020109@libertytrek.org>
	<5238848D.6050703@orlitzky.com>
	<52388A9E.2050709@libertytrek.org>
	<52388C4E.5010804@orlitzky.com>
	<523892C3.8090605@libertytrek.org>
	<52389754.60700@xunil.at>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:11:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw0idYZ9GbF485e_m6_SxSnnC69+QfgrqK1iTT4JdJi9JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 602ffcb2-9916-45e9-afac-d8adc08d644b
X-Archives-Hash: e5d0724f12d48025e3f70ef99a1efc5c

> I have to set up a server w/ 8x 1TB in about 2 weeks and consider ZFS as
> well, at least for data. So root-fs would go onto 2x 1TB hdds with
> conventional partitioning and something like ext4.

Is a layout like this with the data on ZFS and the root-fs on ext4 a
better choice than ZFS all around?

- Grant