From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150079-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D3A1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:31:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60C08E0DBF;
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E07E0D0E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:30:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e11so885999wgh.21
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 03:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=6HptE+6CiUeqSiRQ/2S/iAXZ4JFP0mPfSyaF1N0ifRE=;
b=oiq0LYjTNuTxEQDnvbWhcFvxf1Zlx2xnG14EocozZ8YuyngfPRHtmL6/lr/kLl3Yn+
V8XeSI0B6lMw/+G1U6171ry0jcRHkhLsQ6IIi1yyb+thLiTa0pYWvTONnJT693HYyMOJ
ago9PjOEFfbEwPULkx7gOnuxMcCdhGFh7BUJx3B1TKKv6V7oOdHO+D+AaKLm2fildmE3
6oD+zso8BjgicRqSakHPjrJQothx/U4Ca7pwR81JBiiSY42dMebE1KTwzczeDIZgb50F
Cnbc/otyoW50Mh3GBIHgh6I2H9Jib3hrBdaKQ7UsaNqrbuSmaGqxMplnoANu6HyWoQXQ
IeCw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.11.8 with SMTP id m8mr10934412wib.31.1377599448892; Tue,
27 Aug 2013 03:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.93.199 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 03:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 03:30:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw0e36KJQNvqp4kQ6EoMUnLp5ssOfF8maikGXk5HN8evrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: bebc1d4f-8bba-43b7-ab92-44ae8cc990e2
X-Archives-Hash: 729dfbab632c27f2bdf6c211b5bbb313
I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider. I just checked my DNS
settings at dnscheck.pingdom.com and I got:
1. No SOA record was found when querying the name server. This is most
probably due to a misconfiguration at the name server - a zone must
have a SOA record.
2. Nameserver * does not do DNSSEC extra processing.
Are either of these something to worry about?
- Grant