From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150651-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E44B1381F3 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A058E0D20; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085DAE0D18 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n9so1289525qcw.19 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:14:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0WI8Gtem9O1o89EWSxAsRZ7QQDkjUaTGFrUbs24Y4OE=; b=fOgyhuPM2hgNjBfNT8zNjEWIiLA8iduFZTVSPftQIreIKMpYUACRbmoycmHKKFf/p0 KEjmM3TQWTfE+qYbpPKjjs+aJLrUrB8LYJSfCOTLma5kFn2aOUJB2rWH50FPCnazDhTf /KPc36ukPssPPz4cYAlXUzBh0bFchspdH9c39BrRFGinlj/NpBE8hOL9g6VNF3/RL7zw 1Rcx71P5bfESH1to+nmsvjWE0h3dzbl0+w8bEbZQwjtC3poDoYYBxSl08EdOcjxaWqs3 apXSPhbOx7k+oZhbWvJ8zzQvX3upzTY+s4DazQqnOWIo1Y/KlPM3rviBmc/d893/RFbH /U8Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.121.134 with SMTP id lk6mr29934350qeb.23.1379110445170; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.25.83 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:14:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52338A8E.1010708@thegeezer.net> References: <CAN0CFw0dkS=vCSXTPWyXDKOi=RVzKGEqXo56YiupvejfvJc1yQ@mail.gmail.com> <52338A8E.1010708@thegeezer.net> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:14:05 -0700 Message-ID: <CAN0CFw0ZKPiR__bbdmqX4SG1gOObpPqu74eDP6ct4XQq2t=-Eg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Need a new server From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: bc86b7b2-3b1e-4b31-b27d-dfb794e11f56 X-Archives-Hash: e761ba1bd025a5c6154167747cda08ab >> It's time to switch hosts. I'm looking at the following: >> >> Dual Xeon E5-2690 >> 32GB RAM >> 4x SSD RAID10 > nice >> Can I count on this system to keep running if I lose an SSD? > if a built in raid controller, yes. one thing you might want to check is > linux tools for management -- you wouldn't want to reboot just go to go > into the raid tools and check if it requires a rebuild, and you want to > be able to schedule regular scrubs and maybe get a report. > you might also like to consider OOB management such as IPMI, dell and HP > do very lovely web based control panels that are independent of your > main o/s allowing you to get alerts when bad things happen, and > crucially watch reboot process from remote locations. Good idea, I will look into IPMI. >> Is a 100M uplink enough if this is my only system on the LAN? > gigabit NICs are pretty cheap i'd be surprised if any new machine didn't > have gigabit. i would suggest if you ever want to transfer data over > 10GB across the network you should request gigabit I should be OK with 100M. I shouldn't be copying anything across the LAN. >> Any opinions on Soft Layer? >> >> - Grant > are you putting this server in colocation at softlayer? if so OOB is a > requirement, and gigabit is not I decided against colocation because I don't want to be responsible for fixing hardware problems. It would be a hosted machine. - Grant