From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150762-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A830D1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE842E0C69;
	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:20:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8AE0E0C4C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 04:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c3so4291451qcv.32
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Zlci1PtPEcL+WtTB4suDAeBMcBfbf3w3IjY4lrNlvLQ=;
        b=q5oRB6hQlIMlWj09gOS913doF1YpsSWdTkrHFx4XDy33WVr/U8FWLDVD0DpFjIX3nT
         7veuFB291418o6ALGPfQ5+5vJ9+FfIFlcCsjqMJ2rHPb7+U5OqVcsAHsAAzju5eS5q2b
         ee2WFDhmW/i2NkFl52H0osdoadeJ55L0NHze3FTIfs/BSULnk/lEoHv83cMqtGRsYwyb
         //671hq17xnba1s/3WWOm4Y8eFFjx2FcpwE599YWx6bWRBCfqJ73FiK3FVznwgNN5e3A
         36L1gHA1/an6WkF0cAQ/zXlA4bWkdNvgKh4ccJSnhfc0F2ABJD0vdL+U6ZGsk22TIcXF
         dcdQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.71.106 with SMTP id t10mr59082982qeu.26.1379478031035;
 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.25.83 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5238ADD7.8020700@googlemail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw1nGVZxJGGsq4TZidEPuyLDkcD0oYRDOOfNzFFM2vQ-tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<523898A3.7000404@googlemail.com>
	<2097.1379441483@ccs.covici.com>
	<5238ADD7.8020700@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw0RtRX0+pCXtR_gAOioM056z3viJ+28bVBAUvreC80_SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 2467c719-8839-459b-8e2a-f25f9abddeb2
X-Archives-Hash: 8c6765e6c2f111b3d176491d989d00cf

>>>> Besides performance, are there any drawbacks to ZFS compared to ext4?

How about hardened?  Does ZFS have any problems interacting with
grsecurity or a hardened profile?

- Grant