From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Managing multiple Gentoo systems
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:45:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw0QK7FGy_G2JV1pcOMeSVqfPt_bhvKEUWXvMjBTckZe+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20110711T171320-200@post.gmane.org>
>> After a frustrating experience with a Linksys WRT54GL, I've decided to
>> stick with Gentoo routers. This increases the number of Gentoo
>> systems I'm responsible for and they're nearing double-digits. What
>> can be done to make the management of multiple Gentoo systems easier?
>> I think identical hardware in each system would help a lot but I'm not
>> sure that's practical. I need to put together a bunch of new
>> workstations and I'm thinking some sort of server/client arrangement
>> with the only Gentoo install being on the server could be appropriate.
>
>
> Hello Grant,
>
> You have similar goals as I do. In addition to what you are doing
> I'm planning on managing thousands of embedded devices, remotely,
> for controls purposes.
>
> The new ARM-15 chip is suppose to be an "Intel Killer" in both
> the server space and workstation space. It is also is going
> to be the chip for 3D video and multi-head devices, such as
> you purport to building in your other emails.
>
> TI is very aggressive on the ARM-15 chips based mother boards.
> Embedded Gentoo runs on the panda board, thanks to Armin76!
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=4&chap=9
>
> I'm not sure you can wait a few more months, but, in my research
> the ARM-15 based devices are going to make significant inroads
> into many areas.
>
> http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-outed-twin-cortex-a15-cores-kinect-style-tracking-more-07131324/
Thanks James. Would ARM-15 machines be a good match for PXE booting?
I'm thinking I just need something minimal so the ARM-15 might be a
great choice if I understand it correctly. It wouldn't matter that it
runs Gentoo since my clients would be diskless, right? I'm still
trying to get my mind around this.
- Grant
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-02 22:14 [gentoo-user] Managing multiple Gentoo systems Grant
2011-07-03 0:32 ` Dale
2011-07-03 0:36 ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-03 10:09 ` Stroller
2011-07-06 19:46 ` Grant
2011-07-03 16:30 ` Roman Zilka
2011-07-03 20:46 ` Simon
2011-07-03 22:15 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-07-04 20:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-07-06 19:35 ` Grant
2011-07-07 9:31 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-07-07 16:14 ` Grant
2011-07-08 19:03 ` Grant
2011-07-08 19:36 ` James Wall
2011-07-11 23:39 ` Grant
2011-07-12 2:45 ` James Wall
2011-07-12 3:30 ` Dale
2011-07-12 18:23 ` Grant
2011-07-12 22:48 ` Joshua Murphy
2011-07-13 19:38 ` Grant
2011-07-13 20:51 ` Bill Longman
2011-07-14 21:39 ` Mick
2011-07-07 18:23 ` [gentoo-user] " kashani
2011-07-07 20:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-07 21:01 ` kashani
2011-07-07 21:23 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-11 15:20 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2011-07-11 23:45 ` Grant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN0CFw0QK7FGy_G2JV1pcOMeSVqfPt_bhvKEUWXvMjBTckZe+w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox