From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150258-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7771381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  1 Sep 2013 09:17:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBE02E0CF4;
	Sun,  1 Sep 2013 09:17:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944F8E0C74
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  1 Sep 2013 09:17:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m46so2565155wev.34
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=hgtMyHYfqeq3vLm8+Kz0KNiYpIxvp8bsv9n0MCq1HKk=;
        b=fedDQqjS1laJ7Wga+nuJKPlN6WeTHiAO9leksLWieS+6J7Hp3SNGX17vkMjJjFVVO7
         9WLvJXUi8Nq8SsY9WdPCYRqQW3royOa9Z/8ywSUOtHzXHQUHndGv5l2a9xuzuLfOs8bA
         7fLY4fCcWZLi1czI0v/PkAN/yBycMPiLZxDwKUCVCduhA3P4MZHSmhohueImTNy11xJ7
         K0HJMLxmtICgyLH82o7G8SdAasv202z0ESgOQhZhz/wg6DPvOQ/GNJhdhEE9GaeteGx+
         xNfKUoh9nnSDLdRgJjlE6eWev/uiq4l+8lH2PurRseF1HU8i8gz+yEbc9alp9+rm/7um
         4KBA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.89.175 with SMTP id bp15mr8974176wib.56.1378027025271;
 Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.93.199 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 02:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522302F8.30301@gmail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw0e36KJQNvqp4kQ6EoMUnLp5ssOfF8maikGXk5HN8evrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<521C9323.1080007@gmail.com>
	<CAN0CFw2UxhW34e-A5qpX9Qive2gVoxA1H2hGdR6Yg=X5fHd4Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<522302F8.30301@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 02:17:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw01iNe-8zXP4N+thfOhweE7x6Jr08gpUwbrZiv+j1JgWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 43cc3ed8-be97-479e-9a63-3ccef096be24
X-Archives-Hash: 479c08a6a3f067562b25376ed582ca77

>> Does this look OK?
>>
>> $ dig soa MASKED.com +short @MASKED1.MASKED.com
>> MASKED1.MASKED.com. MASKED.MASKED.com. YYYYMMDD00 3600 1801 604800 3601
>
> That looks OK, doubly so if all listed NS servers return the same answer

They do indeed.

> In all likelihood I'd say you are dealing with a DNS-check web site that
> is over-enthusiastic, or can't deal with network errors or just plain buggy.
>
> IOW, odds are very good that there is nothing wrong with your domain at
> all :-)

Many thanks Alan.

- Grant