From: Michael Trausch <mike@trausch.us>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new printer suggestions?
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:08:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMBGJbHxqb-5oieeYZXg15wrpS_60dCLypKacGpiu6ay9tcbWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201209242308.32751.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]
To add to the list of recommendations, I have used Lexmark lasers (mono and
color) for a long time and been very happy with them. They work with
standard PostScript drivers out of the box, with duplex support for those
models that have it. Their inkjets are crap, but then again they all are; i
don't use ink jet printers at all.
On Sep 24, 2012 6:15 PM, "Peter Humphrey" <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2012 18:45:29 James wrote:
>
> > So now I'll have to think about all of this some more....
> > HP printers have worked for me for over 14 years with linux,
> > unix and bsd systems......
> >
> > I just cannot find an HP printer that fits my previously
> > described needs...
> >
> > I may just get 2 for less than 500.00 as the HP 7000 officejet
> > does handle the large 11x17 (A3 ledger) paper......
> >
> > thanks to all for the input; other can still make some suggestions.
>
> I don't remember what you said you wanted, but I have a Kyocera FS1020-D
> mono laser which has performed faultlessly these last five years or so.
> It has a duplexer which also is driven properly. I also have a next-to
> useless HP D4260 inkjet. It purports to work properly but it's used so
> seldom that I can't get an even ink deposition.
>
> HTH.
>
> --
> Rgds
> Peter
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1670 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 0:34 [gentoo-user] OT: new printer suggestions? James
2012-09-24 0:55 ` Michael Trausch
2012-09-24 14:01 ` Joseph
2012-09-24 14:32 ` Michael Mol
2012-09-24 17:45 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2012-09-24 22:08 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-09-24 22:50 ` Matthew Marlowe
2012-09-25 3:33 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-09-26 21:08 ` Michael Trausch [this message]
2012-09-27 19:06 ` Chris Stankevitz
2012-09-24 22:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2012-09-26 16:01 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2012-09-26 16:15 ` Michael Mol
2012-09-26 20:13 ` Chris Stankevitz
2012-09-26 20:45 ` Michael Mol
2012-09-27 4:59 ` Chris Stankevitz
2012-09-27 15:53 ` James
2012-09-27 16:40 ` Michael Mol
2012-09-26 20:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-09-27 16:30 ` James
2012-09-26 20:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Thanasis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMBGJbHxqb-5oieeYZXg15wrpS_60dCLypKacGpiu6ay9tcbWA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mike@trausch.us \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox