From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144385-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DA71383FB for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CF9F21C03C; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A05E0417 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l6so1480971vcl.23 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yyPAGMz7yT4f2XW81M2H6Q6f+POtu1uz3IRQBzkbVaY=; b=Vlsr+jEgT+cDYLdF7Gq0ifeAhIL0n/XWgsDIw9ta7BkFYsxMtGWOAVyG/7sztGSVeW jHixawGK97XtfSiWHLkqUUH/PKlmO0UkTdA+25TwsSjhjs8fTB/vym4aT0DjVC0kIe2M 3Tx51hZ6EGGnpm5elIAgA2LdoA70ROlKF1FHZNV4NpZMxPTDQC8jhJ3LXXGpxtUZWf2d K+COFX2E1tD73AQ8oV4dTUzZOS07nAMYZRUQq6jNpoj2nOc9CorzDE1dWYRfZzNNvmKA EnOp+KbHQhTCLYnY5yBe3u6VI1iaGxIqaxga75kP/fN9qzV7hJXXpcWG9hVsRHJja6LR 56NA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.23.6 with SMTP id i6mr82129509vdf.100.1357915428729; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.145.34 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <kcp64c$gjf$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <kcp64c$gjf$1@ger.gmane.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <CALxYTP6_u88DsrRhaXDJhze8JX-q0cKXwyHaFzgvv3-w2Xb7pg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 moves from /usr/lib to /lib From: Douglas J Hunley <doug.hunley@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 6eae7081-b4f3-4c7c-8015-a82da967d9c5 X-Archives-Hash: c7d8c5603a855e69f5dd75028601f00f On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to me like very happy news indeed, but I'm interested in contrary > opinions. There's a recent thread discussing how udev-197 breaks lvm2, but > that's a trivial fix once you know about it. > > The problem is caused because many apps including lvm2 install their udev > config scripts in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ (where they never belonged in the > first place IMO) and they should instead now go in /lib/udev/rules.d/. > All you need to do is to re-emerge all of those packages *after* installing > udev-197 and the config scripts will go in the correct place. > > You should do this before rebooting the machine because lvm2 won't work until > its udev scripts are in the correct directory. I dealt with this yesterday and was a little annoyed that the note detailing this didn't include an example of *how* to identify which packages needed re-emerged. I figured it out, but i can forsee a lot of pain on this front from the general user base (everyone on this list shouldn't have a problem with it, imho). > > Doesn't this seem to fix the problem with booting a separate /usr partition? > I was wondering the same thing. It would seem to.. -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@gmail.com) Twitter: @hunleyd Web: douglasjhunley.com G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3