From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144385-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DA71383FB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:45:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CF9F21C03C;
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A05E0417
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:43:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l6so1480971vcl.23
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=yyPAGMz7yT4f2XW81M2H6Q6f+POtu1uz3IRQBzkbVaY=;
b=Vlsr+jEgT+cDYLdF7Gq0ifeAhIL0n/XWgsDIw9ta7BkFYsxMtGWOAVyG/7sztGSVeW
jHixawGK97XtfSiWHLkqUUH/PKlmO0UkTdA+25TwsSjhjs8fTB/vym4aT0DjVC0kIe2M
3Tx51hZ6EGGnpm5elIAgA2LdoA70ROlKF1FHZNV4NpZMxPTDQC8jhJ3LXXGpxtUZWf2d
K+COFX2E1tD73AQ8oV4dTUzZOS07nAMYZRUQq6jNpoj2nOc9CorzDE1dWYRfZzNNvmKA
EnOp+KbHQhTCLYnY5yBe3u6VI1iaGxIqaxga75kP/fN9qzV7hJXXpcWG9hVsRHJja6LR
56NA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.23.6 with SMTP id i6mr82129509vdf.100.1357915428729; Fri,
11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.145.34 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:43:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <kcp64c$gjf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <kcp64c$gjf$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:43:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CALxYTP6_u88DsrRhaXDJhze8JX-q0cKXwyHaFzgvv3-w2Xb7pg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-197 moves from /usr/lib to /lib
From: Douglas J Hunley <doug.hunley@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 6eae7081-b4f3-4c7c-8015-a82da967d9c5
X-Archives-Hash: c7d8c5603a855e69f5dd75028601f00f
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote:
> This seems to me like very happy news indeed, but I'm interested in contrary
> opinions. There's a recent thread discussing how udev-197 breaks lvm2, but
> that's a trivial fix once you know about it.
>
> The problem is caused because many apps including lvm2 install their udev
> config scripts in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ (where they never belonged in the
> first place IMO) and they should instead now go in /lib/udev/rules.d/.
> All you need to do is to re-emerge all of those packages *after* installing
> udev-197 and the config scripts will go in the correct place.
>
> You should do this before rebooting the machine because lvm2 won't work until
> its udev scripts are in the correct directory.
I dealt with this yesterday and was a little annoyed that the note
detailing this didn't include an example of *how* to identify which
packages needed re-emerged. I figured it out, but i can forsee a lot
of pain on this front from the general user base (everyone on this
list shouldn't have a problem with it, imho).
>
> Doesn't this seem to fix the problem with booting a separate /usr partition?
>
I was wondering the same thing. It would seem to..
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3