From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-136962-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SDG3O-0004m3-7C
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:10:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF89CE0ABB;
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6516E0761
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so2260329bkw.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wPxrCim5E9AstktwHYL6aO9qk0hQKvbBWWxXaDAAqVg=;
b=f8xYiJzu4fwGqWt4QK8RJMqSD3xCaUqfNcuiJbTsUGQOdcImkDDYE/aomoxSws60kE
4TME42On2qyBzVA5Bi8wnYSI/hWcrIWSZ86d5DTTynRbBRYkW5JTlCdCdPvm4N/YiPRC
mavJmeRTphFPC2dFOehWTH/55viUgixbE1f9hvhjyQ92Ayw8OoOSD5Qe2KV9LZFDOKnQ
1SLRzF00VzFE4IGA5PhT1wkwI7oovIDf3o7Uc70Q4vez/kYiS46ihcmZxhT1V0jTJE5M
rg265exfOP9BYFeqqDt6q42O8pVWRoeVr20pcBGYP+LBUdFleqRIbYNSvaZzuw8GXQXL
PFig==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.151.86 with SMTP id b22mr14296871bkw.81.1333030120808;
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.40.195 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120329002004.6a4506a5@karnak.local>
References: <1332844604.4130.0@numa-i>
<4F71BE44.3080206@kutulu.org>
<CA+czFiB=9Z_ny4Q8Ro_pkKJJnJEjOc3eZRO4e5-=JHHJzf1imQ@mail.gmail.com>
<01de01cd0c26$98088c40$c819a4c0$@kutulu.org>
<4F71E12F.7060108@gmail.com>
<000901cd0c40$0a137520$1e3a5f60$@kutulu.org>
<4F720751.3020900@gmail.com>
<4F72149D.7060605@darkmetatron.de>
<4F721D30.8090400@gmail.com>
<CA+czFiBhVRjdmB74_4tA6ZVyrJhzELnVEMPq96m1NJwHJPTD0Q@mail.gmail.com>
<4F722735.90500@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+edoBw4+Ft5+XgOjjD6nJVuhtEsJRZ3JcumE3fhoQ5BEpQ@mail.gmail.com>
<4F72348A.2060407@gmail.com>
<20120327235215.7834f4c7@khamul.example.com>
<4F723F01.4040904@gmail.com>
<20120328012023.50434b55@karnak.local>
<20120328234027.33766b9c@khamul.example.com>
<20120328230124.057e1472@karnak.local>
<20120329002640.11ecf6e5@khamul.example.com>
<20120329002004.6a4506a5@karnak.local>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:08:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CALxYTP4Z-Fz82j+qFbMya02iC7F4Hqx7+TO=0xYvLBejPgCQsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought
From: Doug Hunley <doug.hunley@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 093b781d-9be6-4fc0-ba1d-3c8afd50f0e5
X-Archives-Hash: a9985375ae2bba4a7dbda6985a440213
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 19:20, David W Noon <dwnoon@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:26:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
> [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:01:24 +0100
>> David W Noon <dwnoon@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> > With the pending changes to udev scripts, you could well need /var
>> > -- and anything else -- before udev starts. =C2=A0So it is in the same
>> > category as /usr.
>>
>> Maybe, maybe not.
>>
>> However, no-one apart from you is even suggesting such a thing. For my
>> part I'm going to ignore that possibility and concentrate on those
>> things that are being seriously suggested.
>
> The Gentoo developers have been discussing just that. =C2=A0The reason is
> that many of the daemons that can be started by udev scripts require
> work files on /var, so we could well need /var mounted too.
But wait, that's what having /var/run being a link to /run was all
about. This problem is supposed to be *solved* already, damnit
--=20
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3