From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140744-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F28138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1237A21C030;
	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B27E086A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:51:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcpx40 with SMTP id x40so4937718qcp.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=hc2Ie3cKI+9W3y37r9vLsS+/AnSrmrrJLcaA7+wo5kI=;
        b=Vlg8Lhn2zXLMmw8aoO1I56R7XZWKCSiIifN55J02wiHtkTRNdirDz9NH8y3p0v0VEi
         mzN81vQZglrdHElLS4CeBZqc5j2kVC++XKRZ7z5D0E73pMpgzCVxGh7a6yes23YTW3U6
         ALpAryn4IkyvT8gqOnXOh2zyYKWXtVH/0c9RsTedigKF0zNm76xMW8+CcRVevBiG/IvD
         lmRxOmJT+Hj64RA7u2KlJYj6I5SNDJqZP6vj8l8IVKBxcCWCvqdoYkbszEs6pLfmzh4E
         i0t6xPJ/BrZ8VnNhgUopsEaA6ryNADztnh15oy8LD4N5dWrWW+QNl3zXA/dcdrpfyBJ2
         EsNw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.135.75 with SMTP id m11mr13234951qct.66.1345481511291;
 Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.64.201 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yu9ipchadnz.fsf@nyu.edu>
References: <yu9ipchadnz.fsf@nyu.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:51:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CALxYTP4Gp59THUOD9mSye6c-YLbW_Js4POj1neAO33oA30uQCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp -> /var/tmp a problem with new udev?
From: Doug Hunley <doug.hunley@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 94827b3c-315d-41f9-bd3a-b87217ec3975
X-Archives-Hash: f5c006d0d306ce2a1b93aca9c2875b8e

I have this symlink on a new ~amd64 install without a separate /usr
and the latest udev and have no issues at all. I don't use a initramfs
or anything on this install either. fwiw

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
> I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root
> filesystem.
>
> The last few gentoo installations I have done all had
> /usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink
> manually.
>
> Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs
> that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp?
>
> thanks,
> allan
>



-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd                                               Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3