public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
@ 2015-07-15  1:53 walt
  2015-07-15 23:43 ` Fernando Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2015-07-15  1:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Even while slogging through my painful and ongoing update of perl and
friends, I managed to install Virtualbox-5.0.0 and its guest-additions.
(Apparently these two packages don't depend on perl at build-time.)

I fired up my vbox gentoo guest machine and, of course, I tried to
install the 5.0.0 guest additions kernel modules.

I got an error message about usb support in the guest kernel, so I
disabled guest usb support (temporarily) with the vbox gui, tried again
and the guest kernel modules installed with amazing speed.

I'd like to know if anyone else is seeing spectacular speed performance
with vbox-5.0.0.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-15  1:53 [gentoo-user] Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!] walt
@ 2015-07-15 23:43 ` Fernando Rodriguez
  2015-07-17  0:58   ` [gentoo-user] " walt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-07-15 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:53:43 PM walt wrote:
> Even while slogging through my painful and ongoing update of perl and
> friends, I managed to install Virtualbox-5.0.0 and its guest-additions.
> (Apparently these two packages don't depend on perl at build-time.)
> 
> I fired up my vbox gentoo guest machine and, of course, I tried to
> install the 5.0.0 guest additions kernel modules.
> 
> I got an error message about usb support in the guest kernel, so I
> disabled guest usb support (temporarily) with the vbox gui, tried again
> and the guest kernel modules installed with amazing speed.
> 
> I'd like to know if anyone else is seeing spectacular speed performance
> with vbox-5.0.0.
> 
> 

No noticeable performance improvement for me using hardware virtualization.

The USB issue is because it no longer pulls the extension pack or additions 
packages as a dependency so you need to add them to your world file. It also 
fails to compile for me with doc or sdk flags.

-- 
Fernando Rodriguez


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user] Re: Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-15 23:43 ` Fernando Rodriguez
@ 2015-07-17  0:58   ` walt
  2015-07-17 21:04     ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2015-07-17  0:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:43:05 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@outlook.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:53:43 PM walt wrote:
> > 
> > I fired up my vbox gentoo guest machine and, of course, I tried to
> > install the 5.0.0 guest additions kernel modules.
> > 
> > I got an error message about usb support in the guest kernel, so I
> > disabled guest usb support (temporarily) with the vbox gui, tried
> > again and the guest kernel modules installed with amazing speed.
> > 
> > I'd like to know if anyone else is seeing spectacular speed
> > performance with vbox-5.0.0.
> > 
> > 
> 
> No noticeable performance improvement for me using hardware
> virtualization.
> 
> The USB issue is because it no longer pulls the extension pack or
> additions packages as a dependency so you need to add them to your
> world file. 

Thanks, I will.

A comment on nerd humor:  while using vbox-5.0.0 my eye was drawn to a
little black spot in the vbox main window, and I wondered if it was a
dirt speck on my monitor screen.

I put on my reading glasses to take a closer look.  It turned out to be
a new icon for the "Clone selected virtual machine" button in the form
of a black-faced sheep.

I conclude that this must be a sly reference to Dolly the Sheep, the
first 'higher' animal to be cloned successfully, except that Dolly
didn't have a black face, according to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_(sheep)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-17  0:58   ` [gentoo-user] " walt
@ 2015-07-17 21:04     ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  2015-07-18 23:22       ` Fernando Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeremi Piotrowski @ 2015-07-17 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:43:05 -0400
> Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:53:43 PM walt wrote:
>> > I'd like to know if anyone else is seeing spectacular speed
>> > performance with vbox-5.0.0.
>> >
>>
>> No noticeable performance improvement for me using hardware
>> virtualization.
>>

Also here the paravirtualization additions are not having any
noticeable effect on performance (checked with the Windows Experience
Index on W8).

What I am seeing though are various regressions:
- fullscreen no longer goes fullscreen (with fluxbox doesn't cover
  the slit and hides behind toolbar)
- weird sound/video problems with youtube (accelerated video, constant
  popping noises)
- doesn't work at all since I updated to the 4.2.0-rc2 kernel

I had great expectations but so far I'm disappointed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-17 21:04     ` Jeremi Piotrowski
@ 2015-07-18 23:22       ` Fernando Rodriguez
  2015-07-20  1:50         ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-07-18 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Friday, July 17, 2015 11:04:04 PM Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:43:05 -0400
> > Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:53:43 PM walt wrote:
> >> > I'd like to know if anyone else is seeing spectacular speed
> >> > performance with vbox-5.0.0.
> >> >
> >>
> >> No noticeable performance improvement for me using hardware
> >> virtualization.
> >>
> 
> Also here the paravirtualization additions are not having any
> noticeable effect on performance (checked with the Windows Experience
> Index on W8).
> 
> What I am seeing though are various regressions:
> - fullscreen no longer goes fullscreen (with fluxbox doesn't cover
>   the slit and hides behind toolbar)
> - weird sound/video problems with youtube (accelerated video, constant
>   popping noises)
> - doesn't work at all since I updated to the 4.2.0-rc2 kernel
> 
> I had great expectations but so far I'm disappointed.
> 

Fullscreen works fine on kde and openbox.
I've had the sound problem with earlier versions and pulseaudio. IIRC I fixed 
it by tuning PA fragment size.
And it works fine with 4.2.0-rc2 for me. Did  you remember to re-emerge app-
emulation/virtualbox-modules (after setting the /usr/src/linux symlink to the 
new kernel source)?


-- 
Fernando Rodriguez


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-18 23:22       ` Fernando Rodriguez
@ 2015-07-20  1:50         ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  2015-08-12 15:54           ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeremi Piotrowski @ 2015-07-20  1:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user


On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:

> 
> Fullscreen works fine on kde and openbox.

Works fine on fluxbox as will, but only with <=virtualbox-4.3.30 (I'm 
using the binary package btw).

> I've had the sound problem with earlier versions and pulseaudio. IIRC I fixed 
> it by tuning PA fragment size.

I'll check that but I have a feeling that the popping in the audio is 
connected to the accelerated video. But as I said, pulseaudio normally 
works fine, and everything works with the previous virtualbox version.

> And it works fine with 4.2.0-rc2 for me. Did  you remember to re-emerge app-
> emulation/virtualbox-modules (after setting the /usr/src/linux symlink to the 
> new kernel source)?

Yes and yes. However now I'm experiencing lockups whenever I start a VM in 
virtualbox 5 when running kernel 4.2.0-rc2, so I can't even check anything 
else. For the time being I'm back on 4.1.2; let me see again if I can make 
it work here.

And Btw. I'm not talking about starting a fresh vm here, I have an 
existing one that I'm trying to migrate.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!]
  2015-07-20  1:50         ` Jeremi Piotrowski
@ 2015-08-12 15:54           ` Jeremi Piotrowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeremi Piotrowski @ 2015-08-12 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> And it works fine with 4.2.0-rc2 for me. Did  you remember to re-emerge app-
> emulation/virtualbox-modules (after setting the /usr/src/linux symlink to the 
> new kernel source)?

So it seems I wasn't the only one with the problem on 4.2 (linux):

https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=68883

It has been acknowledged and fixed and will be released in a future
version.

I'll have to wait until then for a second impression of Virtualbox 5.0.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-12 15:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-15  1:53 [gentoo-user] Virtualbox-5.0.0 [wow!] walt
2015-07-15 23:43 ` Fernando Rodriguez
2015-07-17  0:58   ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2015-07-17 21:04     ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2015-07-18 23:22       ` Fernando Rodriguez
2015-07-20  1:50         ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2015-08-12 15:54           ` Jeremi Piotrowski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox