From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138732-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SZKla-0000QG-6C
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:39:15 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00CADE0B8B;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 11:38:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0125BE0B6C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:35:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so1962277ghb.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 04:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Xmi5KDSsYmwVqE3DjZctfdq1bp6WFk1Oryc9dsb+NWA=;
        b=CeficN7xhbGfrBvFuDmoabmvmpdx7Jch+jnSE8j0SygTZ8f7wEGJIagEe/6XsOIIiH
         F6lNgi8WpewZ9S87QYeGOIg3oWG+N01CjIjmNZ8/tXnnF25FP7EeEYHWvyn7BcIYOv3X
         aQdgrIwkpOhLeaTqeT5r1nRhVBEgICa89eHiou3Y2nKkQ50JrLmM7kewl92GSp5+0cSL
         L8UHia4M6hcBTQhSFbAmC/FKSwK+ekRyyL2/3aH3ucxfthN8/dI2Vfpibot+nFkIGJvE
         RhxdrcHDLN+1NPRrgBeOrcbJY39jmeLNLmBfG2Ysr0AoxLTxSS3VdC/Xa8ObtNjpAERH
         zIuA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.6 with SMTP id 6mr10866467oey.35.1338291343353; Tue, 29
 May 2012 04:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.81.105 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 04:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <jq25mf$9ei$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4FC3DA4E.9030009@xunil.at>
	<jq25mf$9ei$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 08:35:43 -0300
Message-ID: <CALF0-+VU8oFUhJu_CYO6ENmBEZoMJ1p0Zawt1e3n1vKwaiUP=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ~gcc-4.7.0
From: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 4abc94d3-96a2-418b-b26d-8b9a5eced138
X-Archives-Hash: abfa82cb2efd69b84090a60762405260

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> On 28/05/12 23:04, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>>
>> As GCC-4.7.0 appeared for ~amd64 now ...
>>
>> anyone recompiled system or world with it already?
>>
>> More advantages or disadvantages?
>
>
> Since you didn't mention any specific workloads (like audio or video
> compression), I assume you're a typical desktop user (internet browsing,
> email, watching movies, listening to music, etc.) =A0There will be no
> differences in performance with GCC 4.7.
>
>

Have anyone tried to compile linux kernels with gcc 4.7?
Is it faster / smarter ?
Does it shows more warnings or produce faster / smaller code or something ?