From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986C5138A1F for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E18AE0A41; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f196.google.com (mail-we0-f196.google.com [74.125.82.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6798CE092C for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f196.google.com with SMTP id x48so1763779wes.7 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yGh9Jz3GQ7qWSq8GUkJ132+cM00Wb8XT05AAMNoYzdA=; b=azvR7fYjZc+1GdjxbUsMM93WEri9QY3METn1HE38WinCKCG1V8AG+YdhxDcRWzUvkv j2YaC9UZy9qlzu6NtwF/qjKSLCfVYt/6L1HAmubDIQDM679rZgbFY3qHy0AF5b8qoXJc WJngid1ePmBk8JlUuXKj0xsTtT3qXa1LybkPAKri2VVpcBrEik1P7jsjTyc6qfUAzuMs pui0D/MJN33NX2RToMsUYgtBwAD21pTf/Kct/WaT90LnO9nbtldwgpCaejgE5fUbuG16 L62PffQv/iMEZ8u+AlxTVsoBOIelNjSDMzpf5Q8RRZ6pvNU8sENgL3up2PY+tpK1xTm6 1eOQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.13.209 with SMTP id j17mr16620083wic.18.1398707279729; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.249.98 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:47:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0DD1D7F5-B9FF-4BDF-98E3-89F0CE32D271@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <29DDFC49-0411-450E-97D3-A30C5BD7A7A4@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <336F5E53-2948-49A3-95F7-9BDF4284F5A7@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <412DEBC3-2892-4783-8433-FC256B56125A@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <0DD1D7F5-B9FF-4BDF-98E3-89F0CE32D271@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:47:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSP build fails From: Nikita Tropin To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ef06286f-016c-464c-84f0-7cc92909e816 X-Archives-Hash: cf721415d4ae3a431a3c8ed2dbef352a Ok, pambase/shadow problem solved. I called revdep-rebuild and it found libcairo problem, reemerged it, second revdep-rebuild was clean. There are still problems with compilation of packages mentioned above. 2014-04-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Stroller : > > On Sun, 27 April 2014, at 8:20 am, Nikita Tropin = wrote: > >> gcc-config -l: >> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.6.3 >> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 * >> >> These are installed: gcc-4.7.3, gcc-4.6.3, clang-3.3. I'm using 4.7.3 >> and not redefine CC or CXX in make.conf or elsewhere. > > That's good. gcc-4.7.3 is current, so you should be able to revdep-rebuil= d and update glibc, paving your way to ncurses and your other failed compil= es. But IMO you should get the pam / shadow stuff done, and reboot, first. > > >> I found that getting out `pam' flag from `shadow' flags removes block. >> Is it suitable fix(add `-pam' for `shadow' in package.use)? Or ... >> >> As I can understand from >> bugtracker(https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D412721) I need to: >> su # For doing administrative tasks while /etc/pam.d/{su,login,passwd} w= ill gone >> emerge shadow >> emerge pambase >> dispatch-conf && etc-update >> >> PS Thanks Edward, it helps. >> >> >>> =E2=80=A6 IMO you need to address the pambase/shadow block first. >>> >>> They're important packages and the transition is important. > > I intended to say here that "they're important packages and the transitio= n is well documented." > > I've already linked you pages and pages of information on this update: > http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dpambase+shadow+gentoo > > I *think* that you unmerge one or both packages and then reemerge, but I = can't remember for sure. > > It's also hard to say how safe this will be on a system that's in such di= srepair as yours - you might be best to backup the whole system &/or build = binary packages for everything that's presently installed. If you ignore up= dates for a year at a time, you're really risking trouble. > > Stroller. > > > --=20 Regards, Nikita