From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4025A158020 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 02:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D208AE08A0; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 02:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E556E086A for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 02:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id g7so13061570lfv.5 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:46:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FewG+EmmsYTEgU0eVTmeIi/ReFrAzPRZq/pMsHP/JxU=; b=pf5jffyk/S2ptCD60D6gmCVrePvPUCmC4yPYjpdiAysKif4XF0m7sfYHxGoqXsRD8k g0lDAPphIHCTZ9tiNB6w8yYa3qWsCxTBjhJgOPbaCE8BkitXKJBdoRQk7ch286QZgc5w 9YC19EaN7L4sWL0omoA09GSD8bfdMm0kT5x2A0ECH23oMudM+XuggmG8AQ5wd4u3jpjc EyxW813OWmxpk6vn3pGwxzM47WLXyBnTFLcwGuZskbY3fyM9Hbzq50x83kTTvueG5Bz0 4Z+4VPm5GoZstMYLK+IAsPvUgSdF7RMNkY0O4IRvjnzcNg590rPzVM1bx0k7/DiWtgAx BGkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FewG+EmmsYTEgU0eVTmeIi/ReFrAzPRZq/pMsHP/JxU=; b=QGRefjrlxT5txGeSYbeQmMb9lWoxdLf6pygEBwvhlL6YtMp5fXTQs3Sv31dpJQhe2t k+vs4Ood5GIXIn3LUtmI8GcuBucbykuMC1yH/yh382S6AD63SWwiRweV7rG7UlfP7P1x T8+hb3QhdL+Lfz/O6PkGFH60YxRPS/ot/KhKGiEB0icy43J6/JG+en5Tmmmh4IGuBX1A 46YQdye5CzI8QQDfIr1Hy7aNv09IwLQPt/9BuGaGZBnUuBECYIQsOOwl1galswqZUN5Z Gd0wh6S6Y/Rv36nM8lM7PZsmP0egQw/dtu50yl8/LdEY1CmGCOKaNov4KEyD6faSJJpU 1Jvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmjGnGnDCFKyJ4SGNKP4FEHqH8kH/xptqgfFnMA/wUpojRFO9Nj 2vwAnyzE5pba/ktOMG1Uupb56AItwmGCzODO7WiRBvmb5PA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5BjuWPa4aOrZaa60yim0DvnByz+E0WAZeM7jErj+twNcyav9ZitTJpVFz7uf+qGT/fXNMhikGjpvFwKiJs4mU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2820:b0:4b5:88f0:72d1 with SMTP id cf32-20020a056512282000b004b588f072d1mr3756981lfb.446.1670726808977; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:46:48 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9407e524-2226-6ba9-dd7f-bac635d083e3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Rosenbaum Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 21:46:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NAS and replacing with larger drives To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7500705ef84659f" X-Archives-Salt: 8392de9b-c05b-402a-bc24-0e48c6112346 X-Archives-Hash: efa71045f8307f1d38e791848b490563 --000000000000f7500705ef84659f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dave On Sat, Dec 10, 2022, 4:28 PM Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 1:42 PM Dale wrote: > > > It does appear that several people are making it so NAS boxes can be > > easily built by us nerdy types and not be huge. Things are a bit > > interesting right now for hardware and such. Some parts are expensive, > > hard to find or just plain unavailable. Still, I suspect that this will > > get better later on. The good thing, people are working on this. There > > is interest in having a option. > > > > I know I've said this before but yes, people are working on it and it > is buildable by people like us. > > https://www.truenas.com/truenas-core/ > > Any old x64 PC and a few disks will get you up and running. It's > open source as much as BSD is open source. It's not Linux > so there was a little learning to do but it wasn't bad. > > Mine has a small SSD as the boot drive and then RAID1 pairs > running OpenZFS for storage. It's inexpensive if you have an > old computer to build on. > > Good luck, > Mark > --000000000000f7500705ef84659f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Dave

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022, 4:28 PM Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 1:42 PM Dale= <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> It does = appear that several people are making it so NAS boxes can be
> easily= built by us nerdy types and not be huge.=C2=A0 Things are a bit
> in= teresting right now for hardware and such.=C2=A0 Some parts are expensive,<= br>> hard to find or just plain unavailable.=C2=A0 Still, I suspect that= this will
> get better later on.=C2=A0 The good thing, people are wo= rking on this. There
> is interest in having a option.
>
I know I've said this before but yes, people are working on it a= nd it
is buildable by people like us.

https://www.truenas.com/truenas-core/

Any old x64 PC and a few disks will get you up and running. It's= =C2=A0
open source as much as BSD is open source. It's not Li= nux
so there was a little learning to do but it wasn't bad.

Mine has a small SSD as the boot drive and then RAI= D1 pairs
running OpenZFS for storage. It's inexpensive if you= have an=C2=A0
old computer to build on.

Good luck,
Mark
--000000000000f7500705ef84659f--