From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159012-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF5713838B for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A373E0961; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DA8E08AF for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w7so2651582lbi.36 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:35:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Y7dhx/9HeOgvtnNkcDLaJ5XKrFIrP8d/zam1/Le/w1U=; b=F9ZCsmi885YmQ1QtWs2xk4vVaZwV0AQd+JolBGJysU2jekDUOBGVEDy18AmaidtO2Y oNbU9uocq6+8bO/JZLSiAXwmLRNwe4d94qhfecfrZZLT4+qi8ZxNwqjAvw547UrVFw43 TPx2dBzQX8wiAU023l+4S1E2Jpgw9kxOBj0q3Fy/o5weZGUf8E/23H+NrMA1Td6Gfmja NuOR+qmI7YUOEjdEJwyx7c9mfmLQHzAU7ZxDxciPCRfwbQFrFukkjgTOSX8onq3CUKHG Rgesqq/zP+ibvvjFHyIZYup1Ozy5t61K+lss5Ux15jdAQge74V22TRdU8qYUJ2bQNepW +OIw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.142.33 with SMTP id rt1mr42054608lbb.69.1412062505396; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.57.141 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:35:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3301629.ARpgpUkSiD@andromeda> References: <CAKpSnpJj2mPs6qmOUutRYbtkPi04-+O=h5uruanDHY6bc5RmYA@mail.gmail.com> <m0a06e$4ff$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAKpSnpJw+E9yJPCbe9T1uAKp0Lf0SqkxnJv40k+7X8jZHpddCQ@mail.gmail.com> <3301629.ARpgpUkSiD@andromeda> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:35:05 +0100 Message-ID: <CAKpSnpLqL1ORWfG8HTULrWcm0tKn60Ta8iihg7WX-V-8DCqqdw@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bloated by gcc From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 076923c3-c6d1-4580-9849-8842bb57a404 X-Archives-Hash: 5fd8b0b6349f6adc85af5e21e7ac4f36 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote: > > > Did you compile the used libraries using the exact same options on both > systems as well? > When compiling a static binary, the libraries are included into the resulting > binary. > If the libraries on Gentoo are bigger, the resulting static binary will also > be bigger. > Yes, the library (dietlibc) is compiled typing just "make". The Makefile is not modified. I rebuild it with gcc 4.9.1. There are no other libraries involved. When using glibc I didn't made a static binary, and even so it was larger on Gentoo. Thanks Jorge