From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-158995-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A05F13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:02:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50D42E0995;
	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:02:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com (mail-la0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2805E0995
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:02:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id gb8so8638940lab.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=t34pvufcTF08xzE7FF0tsIbNJ7/r6hLv6KhOjheu4CE=;
        b=RVo+Hvw0m1oqoH3AbVlReQ3t7qpmiNj9qHFCcpvaV1OHCZ8teOGgo5XYydFrc7Q6iW
         SStxct04kIqBMv7lKvy1dP3OgiHz8wxLKvlVU1BFg/34i9VHr2N3LigBvQXgQmjznFGE
         lusJFuZ2uKoc1pJS5VtSogswy7fLWrkTw9wkfTYVQsCcsn6QCjiuc6hPvBkQFNVoAuY6
         yqwqj3010VCTU5EjYr5F5lIT3gWexe7nCIDuKweOnWfAIqQwC1NcSR+veE8ZwtjgyON8
         whj7Vq10RBxUbGF59KsUTlWOm6cXyBMP45FM09qIiEXGBN/I+oSXNMCzsuxWD+ooss+D
         /JFA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.170.194 with SMTP id ao2mr40014492lac.78.1412006534561;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.57.141 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <542979E5.5010005@fastmail.co.uk>
References: <CAKpSnpJj2mPs6qmOUutRYbtkPi04-+O=h5uruanDHY6bc5RmYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<542971BF.9090009@marc-stuermer.de>
	<CAKpSnpLydp_tYgaXvkLuz=wVJOnKk+JxgFHCqAOdLsEXYgiyrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<542979E5.5010005@fastmail.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:02:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKpSnpLZUMCxSKCvr=5NUeN3v_-aDk0CO5OEGXB8JMiePfH+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] bloated by gcc
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: c74e9322-6e5c-4f2a-ad5a-8ca2ce997410
X-Archives-Hash: bb26c2a7347ecf7c3a8a88380f856210

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Kerin Millar <kerframil@fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
> On 29/09/2014 16:10, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>

>>>> I'm having a somewhat disgusting issue on my Gentoo: binaries are
>>>> unaccountably large.
>>>

>
> You might consider making contact with the toolchain herd at gentoo or
> filing a bug. I, for one, would be interested to know the outcome.
>
Well, I suppose this one is the list every gentooer subscribes to, and
I would like to be sure I'm not making something silly before filing a
bug...

Meanwhile, I tried compiling with clang. It produces similar sizes in
Gentoo and in LFS (same i3 computer), although about 200B larger than
in Slackware/atom. So, it really seems to be a gcc issue.

thanks

Jorge