From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-174066-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8C81395E2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:23:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2F9AE0CE3;
	Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4592BE0CD2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id g23so188133731wme.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:23:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=vsJ6b/JdrvwgnJvcomhBKP+4avFr/zDZTrvfaA23o/w=;
        b=KudtCOOj6yrRBpyDXDuB4jqCK8J8zjxnYyIJRbDcIzwH4hcPqRdoOYDoA5+L2LkiFE
         9lFDiX5G7pgwN5IXPterrXg+dS8ZMeyJlt/DRqkSx2SgNEgVgU7HU9ijkdIaqqK7geAr
         Yl1DNbCYRulmSSdiuG8Asyd0kK+OkL5uhMGZc/MrZIloRZ3so82iu9UYiAFc9/pw1rGH
         KmqnPJ7pLw2gL8aYUZwNmB7BbuVv/gqsgXkUEvc+4+lqrl257F8YwTCec/2mzjD9Gk7N
         Ma8wwWVwe0taT9o+xTE9e+KUTar8GBPf4VC78/JtcIp5nIzpv6vRhzs4wWQEjsoRSHFT
         wqMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=vsJ6b/JdrvwgnJvcomhBKP+4avFr/zDZTrvfaA23o/w=;
        b=htlIvukdg+RL0k96oGfCQQam8Te53L+y6ANuo8rgBngjrH9DHOjOi5RbcZRNAO48uk
         6vaR02bcle58VmKnSPC6IO+L81dU1o4acWa+J0epzpZj9A5XcZojNf1w/zSZ3mxqrs77
         9pgPkR4Bxs/XMT4tQMGa625ozntCks8BQjS3o4BIgaMeKDv58Rs0dUNlXKzSQBmgVDK8
         ty5Gs4Y29+WLsFAqwJovHNflPfDNQ6Smt3jsoJi8xyk5H91mZ5NZBLjpksbdP+TCFsuy
         MYnCMZFFm7q5cEj17SYns9E0K9cpvaous3Q9IsSb/8i4WezYdcb8U3lWlUMz8q6VCnbf
         jjNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveOop3enXZzb7D6cQOMN6DJwiDbnSwD/616rQ1rzNWR2LBbWwytvx3Fi/cPRFffbZs1fCMFc5L02kK4tw==
X-Received: by 10.25.208.14 with SMTP id h14mr11028294lfg.73.1479237829849;
 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.160.74 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:23:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161115173404.6045.1B7B6629@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
References: <CAKpSnpKRQ1Dtiaw5fj+t7eG+xbaDsVuAr2_cqitb5KD2Kz2YYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161114233843.GA17594@bonus.content> <CAKpSnpLhqqnkHFYqUw=te-yG6s1v8dsi7pc8Vhj4UFbB_pdrnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161115173404.6045.1B7B6629@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:23:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKpSnpLO+AgaQ2ufd1hVwMFuY4Gs1kzb-4VQDr0ZcATSD=cwGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 2eff254b-0e16-47fb-92a2-5ec51a1e0291
X-Archives-Hash: c4af88d04eb1360e4bc2f2d06ec471b6

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@primate.net> wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 23:52, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>> Good to know. I'm currently testing  openbox without dbus-launch. No
>> problem yet.
>
> Do you _know_ a reason you need dbus, at all?

No.

>
> If you don't, you don't need it ;-)

I would like to believe that.

>
> Typically, a lot of GUI apps have dbus as a soft dependency for the sole
> purpose of avoiding multiple instances.  So starting the app for the
> second time just activates (in some general sense) the old window.

Seems harmless enough. But how did they manage to convince nearly
everybody that dbus is the best invention next to sliced bread?

Jorge