From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6681138010 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCBF0E0774; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DECAE0752 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so577567vcb.40 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:09:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=e9L9L7Sypm/05q56/DB9kOh79fDCZpi2/OJ0jvpEGZU=; b=QFdjHqlg9m4F0vJq5LdYipP36DJj8i4otxHBGEPZHcDKXinhpWYxQ68R53Qm2lAQ1+ tY432w6+Z0US2ByYYbpO/zCdDj8yfmsaB7kWZWwzEtdzsddaDz+lJOWf5mpVwm/wqPxP UBzfaDUj9Che3T/E98LQ3kwkpSNJzi/7HFgIJkyCIsLSNmdfvRPdsh9y8pjNjmqrAlsX vI7iYWOceSUn5qZ/iOK0CFl+cFXJ85bZmOuGKjN5y/Rs8zxY03KkT7GxtuB4ATlypnCg KfqcCytzqs+M2wpxLD4CYRd4Evh1N098kRHzXpR8SYO9Brg62mTn7QlfJxO/m9NMzd+o bZsw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.100.67 with SMTP id ew3mr485246vdb.36.1345709372125; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.102.228 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:09:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:09:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xz memory hungry? From: Jorge Almeida To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 0166d76c-dca0-483a-887f-b804ab856f3b X-Archives-Hash: 009f42ddc7d4e059430479bc8104cb69 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 22/08/12 21:52, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> > > > You should file a bug about this. Whoever put that xz there surely has no > idea that this is happening. > > Not Gentoo nor xz fault (see other messages in thread). Thanks J.A.