From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159001-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26BF13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 689F4E09C9;
	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2BDDE09A2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:33:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w7so1639639lbi.9
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ObeRdwgH/Fd87lCmYOYxXr20uxliFjfMPH6uWm2SbX0=;
        b=y6fIVebvGyv3UR0iqxYiVj8HpONZTXtj6ThNLivfpNg1B4UCBZNbH3FfZEOdhDIy5M
         Q7TxCxDzJYK4DVLqctjjP3tqpgODC7BnE3+qIu7RinS+ZEPnhY6n75T2xpOstLUThDmj
         Dp63ziYfGR7/Y1C/l+hX12RLfFWm20Fk76jYU/QfmDKnyqW6ZCsEvoDYzGjaScMiJDu3
         j32+gBoZMvhh/6fI8uhH7V9/oWm9TTwfGbyp/uDXeu8uc1F6nAQkFr/tjgyb9/kFfiKg
         L1BeFIywnXQfsRwsqdX2BTuGT06oqTeVrq8RuBCdJAKwoLW3VT1uUwZK3hGG0MSmWAPS
         0FZA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.142.33 with SMTP id rt1mr38421206lbb.69.1412012024390;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.57.141 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOTuDKqbEpTO+9gjo4hSPKQ1AcANowf0qPG94dOnE=tM2y+HFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKpSnpJj2mPs6qmOUutRYbtkPi04-+O=h5uruanDHY6bc5RmYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<542971BF.9090009@marc-stuermer.de>
	<CAKpSnpLydp_tYgaXvkLuz=wVJOnKk+JxgFHCqAOdLsEXYgiyrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<542979E5.5010005@fastmail.co.uk>
	<CAKpSnpLZUMCxSKCvr=5NUeN3v_-aDk0CO5OEGXB8JMiePfH+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOTuDKqbEpTO+9gjo4hSPKQ1AcANowf0qPG94dOnE=tM2y+HFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:33:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKpSnpKUAdDuoLPV_JHPyCbmwwVsp+qkzPq=fL92w9_ai+g3hw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] bloated by gcc
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 9c17fbd9-e379-4e9e-821c-f173994546f2
X-Archives-Hash: 2d2f315ca3685fb458b5cea49bfcdb51

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Poison BL. <poisonbl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>> I'm having a somewhat disgusting issue on my Gentoo: binaries are
>>>>>> unaccountably large.
>>>>>
>>

>>
>
> Just the off the top of my head thoughts on how I'd approach this. GCC
> has the option to not clean up its temp files used during the build,
> as well as outputting annotated assembly mid-build. The latter might
> be the most enlightening on what's being treated differently in the
> output of the various systems. I don't use those tricks often enough
> to remember what flags are what off the top of my head, since I only
> really dig that deep when playing with my avr based toys, but just a
> couple ideas I thought I'd pass along.
>
Thanks, but interpreting the output is way above my skills. I'll try
the suggestion of Daniel first.

Jorge