From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-174083-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B31D1395E2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4433E0C18;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69908E0BF6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id m203so24860048wma.3
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sbxZoQxhHYpey+9rl/MJS5LeKWe3L9jbwoIC2fpup/c=;
        b=ohgLe5rt05kBatllQjlJRZelg9SaUbn24JMUAWV6EIYgQ0GzMUExyMG69Rawu7/Q7q
         U9cTjYQAEUiTq052eX67IqyLBoJW8IN7Ngo9Lfn8h/cpk2s+Uh2naCTrTcRG2zOao1P+
         DGHmRCCuKqkeHj2u26PxOyP9yibJFs98gP9KD+39QpblVbgthKtpSdSQIt04d6E58akL
         U4Q5Jik34D3B1nxR7sKnCP3y/dy3m3efUzAJFACZclu7lY+PJXzoDJE8y9jnzW7hI6Ud
         DGsuZXiiOHhAsfQzlJnPSGJOsqLeZi6ljO5/StHUZ/+6m5XeHdjXtPmu84wLw/9/lH4i
         oHXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sbxZoQxhHYpey+9rl/MJS5LeKWe3L9jbwoIC2fpup/c=;
        b=JPdAKPiUtQbwUZwqNhQ7PtQiGJEEE6HyoezNA1COk9trwOLlDM/VwSqDkUvUD3L5L9
         wdc8F0KlfpZUlDi8Re9m2847g6ZITN7DOheK3CcXeBML45xgersO+j5MmMzTzFTYf8Ox
         8maK/6G0EmW4yz+vHytJ+4fVdTSyNtAGsFCoo5XgOySOrHi4ndpBeQoSw4uzRbb6PqSf
         ZACzTwKl4VlV8IHiblzEmvhIeQJDMFGw8QhCM54KRLP9gH5/AXHhVBWttw/OTa8WU6Ch
         1GYulrRPXcKzuvZYr0CY7evsOuRwoQXTrrMy23ILMeLdUCYkqCta88chnLUFj3SbO9Op
         sZVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcXAeTfjm/4JdB4hPE9mD54b4WZjS1lkHyNucHsm5R0SaQnpxTWoljoqSbRCWIeYnB4Oyv2/eOb6zZYFw==
X-Received: by 10.25.92.74 with SMTP id q71mr983766lfb.140.1479415818065; Thu,
 17 Nov 2016 12:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.160.74 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:49:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161117204257.GA32303@tp.fritz.box>
References: <CAKpSnpKRQ1Dtiaw5fj+t7eG+xbaDsVuAr2_cqitb5KD2Kz2YYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161114233843.GA17594@bonus.content> <CAKpSnpLhqqnkHFYqUw=te-yG6s1v8dsi7pc8Vhj4UFbB_pdrnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161116021032.GA20819@waltdnes.org> <CAKpSnpLoKZZMBFsDjNO33gazu0O1rAHJwMwqPm7k6sei9jD6Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161117204257.GA32303@tp.fritz.box>
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:49:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKpSnp+dDJM6zgRN4tUSxbJVyE6RVZaXDCQFv_QFr81q-m+4yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gnome intrusion?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 217ffced-6251-4ccc-b70f-65e3305f31e4
X-Archives-Hash: fab229d55dab92d84e366f1c5a72f553

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:23:02AM +0000, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>

>> I tried Pale Moon once, but I think it had the same problem as Firefox
>> regarding cpu use, namely with youtube.
>
> That=E2=80=99s one reason why I had never used video sites in the past an=
d now as
> soon as I found out about youtube-dl. Unlike its name suggests, it suppor=
ts
> dozens of video sites.
> Not only allows me that to play the video using my favourite video player=
,
> but also to play at higher speeds -- all of that at minimal system load.
> (Not to mention being able to achive videos I=E2=80=99d like to keep).
> --
Good hint. Still, some of the suggestions from youtube are useful, and
I suppose I would loose that.

Regards

Jorge