From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144919-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954B01387AB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:27:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AF8CE064A;
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:27:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qe0-f49.google.com (mail-qe0-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0654EE0525
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:27:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qe0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5so1540966qea.8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:27:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Y3+8pOZ/4r6gq4WPI886DcTmFM1BR8PUidUIwsPvHxA=;
b=UzAECAH71IhZo0wk21nb1MsXa6xfVpDrfYwAyhVyiUSNCaaU9Lv3NuO46J8SZPTj/H
QMwfbi1g2feUuwo/Em9yu2uBV+wfoz2rqSMVKQgeXuAKiGPvbh4+G6I750MHxyBiYGST
kDgoEXRq6CaWtQDF0cfG7DzMGgcHtsvWM8djWU4vC5ZOUnX114alrNUmuAUUNXXxdxvu
03bYuh5D0tC2G3JzPP7ZIdRD4W81gdJWsHj9hsZRUQUfLN4cP53pDRa1iIu+TImuLHjs
hbJ4hw3H+R+CdFgoFc7uQgEnbqex53Hrbha6g+3tT2BP29q1M3TDTsedRKLtGYCLdDOp
egVw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.176.19 with SMTP id bc19mr10728475qab.46.1359674839063;
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:27:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.36.74 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:27:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADPrc814d92vJUQ4e4PB=ZKtfG_XA+fBZYAkGFTT5UeEo87Szg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5109521C.3030207@xunil.at>
<20130130173615.GA10408@BIFROST.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
<51095D00.2040100@xunil.at>
<CADPrc835006jxpzQx6Y+jCaesFnob82zy8b3+znNpAid73Oo_g@mail.gmail.com>
<51095EBB.3070709@xunil.at>
<CADPrc83U5yvF7bm1No=fxCbyb4pmmATFPzCgYwhbDS8r7BMdpA@mail.gmail.com>
<510962CF.7000107@xunil.at>
<51096750.6010002@xunil.at>
<CADPrc83yFM+GJ5CAO=n6jsoyi-XBXiZusBW_z+nyr98d-b98hw@mail.gmail.com>
<51096BA0.6060809@xunil.at>
<CADPrc83koVDNc-QNn1DzWSJiHDpMzXf9ZPFK-QvFTfKM6J2qjw@mail.gmail.com>
<510972F6.7040306@xunil.at>
<51098123.2010507@xunil.at>
<CAKkyAYZtmztwuEo1GuXRHHExXiVN=BifQuwi79gdMjRbqrYY8g@mail.gmail.com>
<CADPrc814d92vJUQ4e4PB=ZKtfG_XA+fBZYAkGFTT5UeEo87Szg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:27:18 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKkyAYaxAw58dU2N0k29OTF1i3Hp2SpEOiTGi-Kqv6WZ0Lwd1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2
From: Alecks Gates <alecks.g@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 17a13aca-bf99-4207-8b7e-ba40a79e0ad3
X-Archives-Hash: 821be469182f76609a811069996945a5
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s <caneko@gma=
il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alecks Gates <alecks.g@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@xunil.at> w=
rote:
[snip]
>>
>> I switched to systemd not too long ago and I have the same issue as
>> well, at least it sounds the same -- Basically, I get a hanging GDM
>> after typing my password and logging in. I'm certainly no expert, but
>> I've enjoyed the rest of systemd so I've stuck with it and just use
>> startx to boot into Gnome3. I'll attatch some logs from /var/log/gdm.
>
> Alecks, your error is different, and one similar to one I had before:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D363061
>
> What does systemctl status accounts-daemon.service says? Actually,
> could tell me what services are in red when you run "systemctl --full
> --all"?
>
> Regards.
> --
> Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
> Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
> Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico
>
$ systemctl status accounts-daemon.service
accounts-daemon.service - Accounts Service
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib64/systemd/system/accounts-daemon.service; disab=
led)
Active: active (running) since Thu 2013-01-31 17:02:33 CST; 16min ago
Main PID: 3326 (accounts-daemon)
CGroup: name=3Dsystemd:/system/accounts-daemon.service
=E2=94=94=E2=94=803326 /usr/libexec/accounts-daemon
$ systemctl --full --all | grep error
auditd.service error inactive dead auditd.service
plymouth-quit-wait.service error inactive dead
plymouth-quit-wait.service
plymouth-start.service error inactive dead plymouth-start.service
syslog.service error inactive dead syslog.service
A couple days ago (after reading your email from another topic) I
noticed plymouth services do not exist on my machine, and checked
where it's supposed to come from:
$ e-file plymouth-start.service
[I] sys-apps/systemd
Available Versions: 44-r1 44
Last Installed Ver: 197-r1(Mon 28 Jan 2013 03:58:41 PM CST)
Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
Description: System and service manager for Linux
Matched Files: /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysinit.target.wants/plymouth-star=
t.service;
/usr/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-start.service;
$ e-file plymouth-quit-wait.service
[I] sys-apps/systemd
Available Versions: 44 44-r1
Last Installed Ver: 197-r1(Mon 28 Jan 2013 03:58:41 PM CST)
Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
Description: System and service manager for Linux
Matched Files: /usr/lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/plymouth-q=
uit-wait.service;
/usr/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-quit-wait.service;
And auditd.service isn't found in e-file at all. Normally I'm not
surprised by a lack of .service files, as it's not a huge issue[1],
but if this one's so important, where is it?
Canek, I'm getting the feeling your systemd install has matured over
the years, at least with regard to unit files.
[1] Unit files are surprisingly easy for me to create -- I always
found a barrier to entry with init scripts.
Alecks