From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB961582EF for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gentoo.org (bobolink.gentoo.org [140.211.166.189]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: relay-lists.gentoo.org@gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51B5E3431E1 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bobolink.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EF4110479; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D9B1102F2 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-309302f629dso3021741fa.3 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740427912; x=1741032712; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sLhGrlE1wCG8mIAx/e19OgM60KJqN45CSgMHdTepgNg=; b=hqavZrMbs2a8h9KITU8kFgGFigWijLz12h7hHDQA9F8OltmMJdrZSTRco63T/uO5gR ayzMutr1Qk/XStbwgchPbi8JtG7BIC4JmsGGYiw7yns6e/7HimLlhvocvTBl5mxE59ao gXhJ4NvqQFwyqK6s+Y2FAMKUEYpiuOIyI9Qp+kSEQ1QXtV2JtIx4RLaocJ8xvkUK+Wx7 VMPYSrxhdv24tvlOXkStQSFdVkgsGD7VkE1t+yct3ZJrGI7M4TDGBqEt3pfgwg5s071T W+vYhe0npoi8SKruCy9NxaTmpQ0ud3OjqQn2evMGS3eRRsczzGa+HBn4okcuS4tK2fbx +zVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740427912; x=1741032712; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sLhGrlE1wCG8mIAx/e19OgM60KJqN45CSgMHdTepgNg=; b=SH2bJoltgQlok0eZLz75zyXzT/2dpcPoW8IGa1m6eweHldossEzrBaAyDtFqFOlOY1 r9VGdcWxgzTukOC+MSugX/EihRjxK4yEZSkdscz1wBBcsov/gE8V6ei/H67hzgw+Zd8O 1KLP4nykEyORng38OESKmb2nIZUWiReepjhay+xVrTMp9XWwH5qlGbLgRVZcU7WdYrn1 a9vN7c7vc8a0SXId7OhZMCAndw67j/oMqRjaNrW2U8DhkLVWz/8HB9hON16MX1ugpTFU iPW9lZM4lu1AGVj6lkvZ4qBuxNLbrx+GBhtCQRWXGSH7IZb8Utm72FgekN6LlDuoInxr KrDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxWhpHP9mNHXgAL/Ww+3bMQO8lG4P1JLODW8mTm7x34n4Nn+lfI PJR1/VkOi4NBiX7tzIxMGTurmgA7HFd2nY4K4iZoK3H71vBSCNM5T+44COS9trtL2grt/vFCaXs EnMIGVIK7v47/or1SDH/xgkgqxfmo/lpD X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvDfLlUrQAgbanFy4dAdN8k02XNkmOWxzZqBHtNhar8nsbrRlBD5PEX88h95gx KCxFnDpDQqtlJHFzKa4rU9sBiHpbBcE03dp+tap83g2KRKKrpGGPf9Fn5sAtzp2/Rg6N4u9BcT0 PnNs2X5qA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+X1QNx/OFbd8nOJQLIfYHIIV5Ycms8/3tVBQBFB41PhOUfPV2ctvJtpQfeEfA4mNTOMHv7pzXl/dyqQ8VENs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a11:0:b0:308:e803:119b with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-30a598582f7mr20217351fa.1.1740427911018; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:11:51 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mark Knecht Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:11:39 -0700 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZlHaU3jGqeLxyNfUqCHG4iD0LpUbzeHaDXlf1kswt7HcZ2frWIa2dfjf0s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] m.2 nvme stick not what I was expecting at all. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8d9d1857-0b37-4ad0-b71c-214ac84856f6 X-Archives-Hash: 6cac86d13932602977bb6518b1532758 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:03=E2=80=AFPM eric wrote: > > If it was me, I would return it. If the title is deceptive, there may be > other problems with the product. > > When I click on the link, Amazon offers similar products of 1 TB NVMe > M.2 drives for a few dollars more with the links provided below. One is > $14 more and the other is $5 more. I can not comment on how good they > are as I don't have any experience with these types of drives. > > > https://www.amazon.com/Kingston-2280-Internal-SNV2S-1000G/dp/B0BBWH1R8H > > > https://www.amazon.com/Silicon-Power-NVMe-Gen3x4-SP001TBP34A60M28/dp/B07Z= GJVTZK > > Eric If Dale cares to search them out there are websites that compare M.2 SSDs for performance. There are a lot of types of flash memory and they can have VASTLY different speeds. When I put together this machine 4 years ago I asked the guys to put in a second 1TB M.2 drive. I went cheap with a Crucial. The machine is dual boot with Windows on the SSST, Kubuntu on the Crucial. mark@science2:~$ lspci | grep SSD 04:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Micron/Crucial Technology P2 [Nick P2] / P3 / P3 Plus NVMe PC Ie SSD (DRAM-less) (rev 01) 05:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Solid State Storage Technology Corporation CL1-3D256-Q11 NVMe SSD M.2 (rev 03) mark@science2:~$ Benchmarking later showed the Crucial to be much slower than the SSST. The cost wasn't actually that much less, so 'my bad...' It sounds like not a problem for Dale's 'copy cell phone data' application Mark