From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB8C1382C5 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 21:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81344E07FA; Sat, 29 May 2021 21:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CA7E079E for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 21:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id 76so7696357qkn.13 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:32:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PNymrDOiAAjsfcWlq3adtf+kV6GZjZM6aIpehPbU5ho=; b=WDH8d4HGbrNZ/X/1fQrQKTzacsAyHXnVUdtED2dXAr/6zXUGKC/r9XnQ1XGQ7Msoco z0rvdlXLfkLP2j48GtDPPPelkrSr0QrAlJfK/pkE5wzhWjJJGzaDjdn/k+Dcw58oDDa3 cdJCanaXEScsy27ZUn2by6nRWBqyq0azK8Ozz2CJBV+cJOrIlZXTczGrL16FygN2bIxR NUlMQGiivGtR4vdzLFZMlBnw9E0Z6otgYg8ueViWfG5c9cK5fhORzFIgnQ0pPxyExxN7 BopZIhT+bJvo15GO+8erIkgjLDfA/zzXZtQeiOYu5z9M9wjLwkdhB6rd8Zlgee8exdVJ lQ8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PNymrDOiAAjsfcWlq3adtf+kV6GZjZM6aIpehPbU5ho=; b=MV96qB4Noc+iTaWRWPeABK5POSXAmxqzDjdlFDN0Ylwmf45ij163g3BHRWX5vMTaD/ ACx4rgYjVAFNktHFOfqRZ7k8MBHcgJjgvyuhd6LUdOLKdp/9060j7u2JEPXaVCELFgjO At9seDF1Q/CA8PNCoh4EdqLog8bcOsU4BpXlXZeTiVUg9vwFQnucxUm4Qb+s++ADFOxC xbGhCSJ/CY4UBhVBSwm1IB8IDwEC8Rx5EYmI+s4KSwwyzPpKy966RTa00A58hx+2ZD57 d33p0GWXw92cTSBXhXnSRIgzMQ1naYn2DC8CH9YLB2D7q0QBB/p79u2nbWh/MA7hqjqt 9tkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53227vpKpUKJcn1Z0AOujoZVzp52b+c/+s8zXT0gUd0NvPmvqMUK xfn54hOvfA/wGLCtYYax6WUicfJ0TKYma2HqHI3dg6FyT3s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJAT2roa4hXqJrDb2dr0cuXrkS4Gw0787auR0PLHMSKzXcEBFB7A/qz1PK45Y3sq/hOCgb7B2ikt3CUShu0h4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a683:: with SMTP id p125mr10038803qke.332.1622323947212; Sat, 29 May 2021 14:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> In-Reply-To: From: Mark Knecht Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 14:32:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is "scp" reliable? To: Gentoo User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095934205c37eba6c" X-Archives-Salt: f6ac8dd4-4002-48ed-859e-419085ba10ab X-Archives-Hash: 1506e3917173bce048e5fbabbfa09012 --00000000000095934205c37eba6c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 2:04 PM Mark Knecht wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 1:33 PM wrote: > > > Another mystery. > > I copied the file to USB 1TB sandisk. > > md5sum check OK same as my computer > > > > > > md5sum /run/media/joseph/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova > > 6f3348f1fb915af9c45806d947558a37 /run/media/joseph/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova > > > > I mount the same USB 1TB sandisk on another computer and running md5sum on same file gives me different number, why??? > > > > md5sum /run/media/fd/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova > > c478cb48e2f7961cb0e3eb452df6e642 /run/media/fd/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova > > Different revisions of md5sum possibly? > > - Mark > On the first machine did the md5sum of the file on the internal hard drive match the version on the USB device? I don't know if the underlying file system type effects this calculation. I'd hope not but I don't know. --00000000000095934205c37eba6c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 2:04 PM Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:>
>
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 1:33 PM <thelma@sys-concept.com> wrote:> <SNIP>
> > Another mystery.
> > I copied the = file to USB 1TB sandisk.
> > md5sum check OK same as my computer> >
> >
> > md5sum /run/media/joseph/SSD-1TB/busi= ness/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova
> > 6f3348f1fb915af9c4= 5806d947558a37 =C2=A0/run/media/joseph/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows-= 7_pro_May-23-21.ova
> >
> > I mount the same USB 1TB sand= isk on another computer and running md5sum on same file gives me different = number, =C2=A0why???
> >
> > md5sum /run/media/fd/SSD-1TB= /business/backup/VDI/windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova
> > c478cb48e2f79= 61cb0e3eb452df6e642 =C2=A0/run/media/fd/SSD-1TB/business/backup/VDI/windows= -7_pro_May-23-21.ova
>
> Different revisions of md5sum possibly= ?
>
> - Mark

On the first machine did the md5sum = of the file on the internal hard drive match the version on the USB device?= =C2=A0

I don't know if the underlying file sys= tem type effects this calculation. I'd hope not but I don't know.


--00000000000095934205c37eba6c--