From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143961-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE28F1381FB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:09:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC84A21C05A;
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:08:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (mail-qa0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5756E21C00C
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id o19so9441702qap.7
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:07:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=I5NSPQtiOVRrTvxjy3GBbj9/yh++Sf/bpGZ31qRmaXU=;
b=D6GvkOisYAagKI0r/ipWzRijQ4lyzXNRKAYidZuqspmKce9o0X+sFozN5+OsPfhjFo
YNez0Oiv2EMXhvwYam+0iJF/GrKqr2UnIg8cTVcyWsxewtBJUbRtkwRV5fQLILkYZJpY
M5CXtT4ckR+DudPqNGOts2DhILJnmt0Rcaq9l8EtJj08H14oT51fgS5wmRBUhifVS9RS
9uH+6LkXzmVUaC+g01rMJZb9x54lxZtFEsn1+xTcLfeLHXkAYxMabFGSqRs6GvzBr4H6
fSuH7zFtiAigQd8ZXOzLH7OpAJz5lPVKQ+fxYOVH62e1KPFIN+MbyFq1D544KW5e4+1W
WxPQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.60.12 with SMTP id n12mr15645961qah.23.1356703646397; Fri,
28 Dec 2012 06:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.186.132 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:07:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121228115430.GD2261@server>
References: <20121228021659.GD3568@syscon7.inet>
<CAK2H+edPn0CQHHxkqHzX5DVZGJvb6L6_b7KHoxYW1tK+vy6KJA@mail.gmail.com>
<20121228023400.GE3568@syscon7.inet>
<20121228033838.GC2261@server>
<20121228115430.GD2261@server>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:07:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2H+eem_YWGUg9D-tz0krUVYphP5+y5_2dU-=YXiVW-a0rfrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 543221ae-bd97-49d4-9700-bbaf7369a04d
X-Archives-Hash: 1efa50a9f19fb336647a7a319cd7e548
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Bruce Hill
<daddy@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> Sorry for replying to my own; must have deleted OP.
>
> This morning's world update only wanted to rebuild gconf because they made the
> gtk dep optional and dropped the doc USE:
>
> [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4:2 USE="gtk%* introspection -debug -ldap -policykit (-doc%)" 0 kB
>
> It was still listed the same by eshowkw in portage, after eix-sync; and it
> built with no problems here.
>
> Are you still having a problem with this?
It's fine here also. I expect the OP will be fine also.
Like I said yesterday, bugs happen. Wait a day. They get fixed.
This sandbox violation seems to show up maybe once a year? Don't know
why but it gets fixed fast.
Cheers,
Mark