From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F831381F3 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3088AE00B5; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9129221C108 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d1so3778948qca.2 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:21:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1ULg8GDg+8dDEswNQjdcKiYftnTl+BdBUr4CtEYCS+g=; b=ORxdKUKHGXw35+vtEUATcBUCSLBtmTXDW6CjhucjAvi9rgYl0zGY1nHr1hvnQvOOmI zibjP7ZdhIBDdnXibKKS9dq188XMozh7COmnYOULz/cJfMsexh9b+fKNwowBJ+ST1vUw i4ExWIqm2dbZfvUeicqAjL7xKiLXM9uKGtOiiTy7OpGf0lBtIm7GS3Tf8pVu+RJAEcPb xhVENM5VDD61lom1Hay5g10AMKZhWbbmPnJfNe8H+OtJGxbpyiXw3Jun5N7lu7lr6vfe cOzh2U503m9p8j/PN5ltCxkYqf61v7i0Zgc3UC3cPlO8zabx5rWk6SewiScXQlpuOnxR EQ6A== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.185.138 with SMTP id co10mr10908321qab.97.1356373278750; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:21:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.186.132 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:21:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121224143520.GD26547@server> References: <20121223192335.GC5230@crowfix.com> <20121224143520.GD26547@server> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:21:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 3.7.1 SATA errors From: Mark Knecht To: Gentoo User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 5c397cce-4803-4b2c-8b54-7b3f1c502d5b X-Archives-Hash: 48c9c70ceaaec7ec7ae5c05f8b76f860 On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:35AM -0800, felix@crowfix.com wrote: > > > Puhleeeze don't put such long stuff in an email. Have you heard of attachments? > pastebins? > Felix, Personally, after years reading LKML, I have no problem with in-line text of _any_ length, especially on the initial post or when you are asked to respond with detailed info. While I understand Bruce's comment I don't think it represents a democratic picture of what this list has been comfortable with over the years. That said, what I do have a BIG problem with is people responding and not taking the time to edit the response down to a few lines that make it clear about what their point is. Many responses to 1000 line emails are 1001 lines - the responder adds a one-liner. That's a real waste. It's a trade off. It's less likely that some of us will go read pastebin stuff, and if we want to respond technically then that's leaving us to copy/paste responses which I'm personally less likely to do. Anyway, you pays your money, you takes your chance... ;-) Cheers, Mark