From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-139433-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SjiQ3-0002uC-QY
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:55:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87FBBE0850;
	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A86E0484
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcpx40 with SMTP id x40so344087qcp.12
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=BCBEMMWzAAjAxGUHCUwAeNTqGbn3dPBB1i5aucfi/80=;
        b=A+jg/h/Y5aTzbo3zMoFXpiCe4MZk0T3ld6OMLFrgsfbdzhVT7zEMz/JGADwCVej/TK
         sXLb8oTPRYtkzraC6kp1uoGVB8zL6AyMwDmjoqKQk994Ku/21DnHUsFkUXhPPLg9qccz
         /Q8qEu9+91jHzOXGFRQ9rJNwcttIzHrrZszthlFYAVeQZHifhyIn9PjxhCZ2o+nV+Xiy
         2dZXihpDE8D9byQ/FdvzyLNPzJlPzpcGBZWk9SJFfbr9HjX79/wqddJOg6npPl6jvAIc
         A46bLZPPJv0mLt0Q7Ae6pH4v2X7x44gHTXyRoQlwasB2+h+5eoxHZBxsJcmNkiAwA5WH
         1R8Q==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.176.148 with SMTP id be20mr28570832qab.64.1340765648997;
 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.190.196 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2H+efTNVptAZD9XpYYzgrh_nQFG3EdtZMoGfThaoV7j28Gng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK2H+efTNVptAZD9XpYYzgrh_nQFG3EdtZMoGfThaoV7j28Gng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK2H+eeSX61Yo55OgPjrXcqGNAzNYgGpXr47A3DNRV4MZbvq1A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: eselect binutils list not matching
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 03d19b85-9e14-490f-a5ad-0c55dcda213b
X-Archives-Hash: c53a425a32e8f268ab33c8bfcb62147c

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> =C2=A0 One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>
> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
> !!! Error: Pattern =C2=A0does not match any installed version of binutils=
!
> exiting
> c2stable ~ #
>
<SNIP>

Confirmed bug but at this point I don't understand why some machines
hit it and others don't. Users should try binutils-config if they run
into this problem.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D423525

Cheers,
Mark