From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-130824-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RODQN-0003ge-MD
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:03:03 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18BEF21C104;
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A372E21C0E9
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so2109880bka.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:59:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=EYYM6f3gqSIReHKoxrYv1+6qszJCp+8czDIwAKT0K34=;
b=NJYoiczb7cqZGBXT48RRb4Zr22ogZRjM/eKFp0dtHpOmOE+VCiCusP1OLjyaEjgaJI
kEILoxCZiPoVDfnk9QF1CCuEzp0ZL4icQx12y0yUdjbwGodAB2C78hDA7NULC9H+5/iX
SSHZMNbzhIdV3dK3zyorHCik3InqU3OGl4qRs=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.131.34 with SMTP id oj2mr1151585obb.71.1320865198006; Wed,
09 Nov 2011 10:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.149.33 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:59:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6520907.JpHmoyeC2f@localhost>
References: <CAK2H+ed+GVof1UeRRim53mVoim-cEZ_0StY8NGZ=iJm4kREfjA@mail.gmail.com>
<2215940.TJDmZqQsbe@localhost>
<CAK2H+ed=RFmwarGwcH=nRjwtBcZcXgK7h0tEHqe=8pyprY1UgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<6520907.JpHmoyeC2f@localhost>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:59:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2H+eeFMFULZ9OCuY8BmoOYAqrs_DdTT9x9Azt-M=2-R5S9bg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev rules for an iPod Touch?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 42daaaab-71fb-44ce-89d8-249393cc9649
X-Archives-Hash: f2bacee19b215f949abbd0efc9ca6ecf
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>>
>> <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
>> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high
>> >> >> performance.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it
>> >> >
>> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment.
>> >>
>> >> Broken in what way?
>> >> I am happily using it without any issues.
>> >
>> > the worst way:
>> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DOTk5Mw
>>
>> Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML.
>>
>> Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the
>> best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago,
>> but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know
>> it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however
>> that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it
>> successfully.
>>
>> What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of
>> Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just
>> down on the application because of what you read?
>>
>> - Mark
>
> except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machin=
e
> deconstructing itself, no, no problems here.
>
OK, good information, although I'm sorry you had the problems.
- Mark