From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RODQN-0003ge-MD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:03:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18BEF21C104; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A372E21C0E9 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so2109880bka.40 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:59:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EYYM6f3gqSIReHKoxrYv1+6qszJCp+8czDIwAKT0K34=; b=NJYoiczb7cqZGBXT48RRb4Zr22ogZRjM/eKFp0dtHpOmOE+VCiCusP1OLjyaEjgaJI kEILoxCZiPoVDfnk9QF1CCuEzp0ZL4icQx12y0yUdjbwGodAB2C78hDA7NULC9H+5/iX SSHZMNbzhIdV3dK3zyorHCik3InqU3OGl4qRs= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.131.34 with SMTP id oj2mr1151585obb.71.1320865198006; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.149.33 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:59:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6520907.JpHmoyeC2f@localhost> References: <2215940.TJDmZqQsbe@localhost> <6520907.JpHmoyeC2f@localhost> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:59:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev rules for an iPod Touch? From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 42daaaab-71fb-44ce-89d8-249393cc9649 X-Archives-Hash: f2bacee19b215f949abbd0efc9ca6ecf On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht: >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann >> >> wrote: >> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: >> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: >> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high >> >> >> performance. >> >> >> >> >> >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it >> >> > >> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. >> >> >> >> Broken in what way? >> >> I am happily using it without any issues. >> > >> > the worst way: >> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DOTk5Mw >> >> Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. >> >> Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the >> best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, >> but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know >> it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however >> that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it >> successfully. >> >> What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of >> Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just >> down on the application because of what you read? >> >> - Mark > > except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machin= e > deconstructing itself, no, no problems here. > OK, good information, although I'm sorry you had the problems. - Mark