From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QvBoh-0000We-CC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:28:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD4BB21C394; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A9121C29C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so3322367qwb.40 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nlwCm94LlHMchd4peyIjvzloC048qqmKek7gg8/CRqU=; b=toRianCAhv/Ij9wW3hTOkQjGWmdOY9QuufCLlwgssNTqDX5ufa6Tih8hmJxh/2e31Z lIPegUbZ+Etexak1QdWSa35iLi6qU6gGGFRdlaZKGqCOPyTji6ar8ITD9q31Eu28hQws KpQCDdtUNN01l/D9Ul5g7i8jtu8u4fGEZ+Yxs= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.210.132 with SMTP id gk4mr941940qab.79.1313947626189; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.74.13 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:27:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201108211127.57077.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201108211319.40825.francesco.talamona@know.eu> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:27:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Suspend to RAM caused crashes From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8bea0f64a132ae35b8a0ba46b1a11ce4 On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > The meaning of all this is that if memtest can't find any errors after a > full run (which can take an hour), the chances of getting an error that is > really related to RAM under CPU stress are very slim. Which I completely agree with