From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142763-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244791381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E111721C051;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B7521C030
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x40so4289675qcp.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:38:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=T0irjNflJOPQSqmCNoMR4w3BSGBT+aUF+qpDJp71ulw=;
        b=f1FVwQhF5PLnhyO2HwOE0acbHiuU/ARM5Il3hAoh7UQZDoOSwDRKVjYJsLm6FfhFNR
         JMxzbOoq+v+HHj2FpGSYezmtOzLnk2ucOA/1t1ZoQ5+g2W24nl9x9kT1tbQsiYXFrRrf
         2f6PTsLs4HReII01uzpEPSA9MiVcx/GLyas0JymaNcHlu2+DV9MrrWR+cWZXqqxuVL0T
         fnfv0SOAeNBQcp7VrGz3gKLdG7xoMAEB3ZGV1k1zM45ocmoUqdkB8VtbZYasl8KCNB0J
         wfY+HEeaX1zfcBgGOEg40Vq/rVj+9C0vd+aeMnypS8veuws3Hub/AIpM3IDTqJtgnm+T
         WrXg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.82.113 with SMTP id h17mr18243335qey.24.1353440320776; Tue,
 20 Nov 2012 11:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.186.132 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:38:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50AB89D3.40508@libertytrek.org>
References: <50AB89D3.40508@libertytrek.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:38:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2H+edxU4XZNyudMznTswJptHp=8sTs+ZHd16JfsuhLiyaLTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev
 (pinned to udev-181)?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 30f50488-d2ab-47fa-8303-58374837e0a7
X-Archives-Hash: c6c3e6adec1c4c006912256d21e4408c

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going on
> with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know it is
> safe.
>
> Tia...
>
> Charles
>

I took one stable machine with almost no ~amd64 packages and updated.
No problems here. YMMV.

HTH,
Mark