From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140810-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692D5138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2756821C01B;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE04E05F9
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:34:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcpx40 with SMTP id x40so780315qcp.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=EYp91YDDaSozeTltrclvV66bOZGIkbyD0FjCzNuF53s=;
        b=ogU6h0d4G/Igf/qgWy6he1V2hII3u0W+A3sONfAEnkU+FNN6m7Pr9z4T0taJXuYJ/h
         LWteiVhSwmcnAiKhOnVmMxi+Ve3jLbeY80ibI19btmMJF/NagEos8/rAyP3tsw2IaJh/
         lAREjCTrZPbSeN7vLr9TfDjxi07CK3qNmX29wuV6h29I/0Jy1E/mIC/kgPuRgdM56lwZ
         CyMuH7yHTJq6Q72DV8SsfPN+d8U41kkXxAEzidNuLiYUXKs6JSbJLEN2KLyXq0/c0itD
         IVglhAK9OFvoS5oX5AZJH92lzuiSY+lRmBfwvULQ+z0dZJCjarTybvd0UB2P+Aui5WUI
         x0mg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.181.193 with SMTP id bz1mr4765831qab.64.1345750496190;
 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.23.65 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120823202245.4678e3c1@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
References: <CAK2H+ed-_Y4=e1ZAtG4_LF=SD=1DAyAXKuTHQn8wCYnSKDg4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEH5T2N-FH91VN2U0_SCZ4EXAu4Vb8w8jPru9nLOYnsHw58DyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+ed4r1rtEO0_YAtN8OTT0H+VkF=jHbRWdQuD_otKKVVxzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+eeiT_L9Z=pnmuV_Q-tvzb8VVb9EsXiSxZp7Px5T5wayJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120823202245.4678e3c1@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:34:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK2H+edmd0uxW-Yt0odvkWWHi4dSpL4s9cuBkG+jfXR24Pm7eA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SSD performance tweaking
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 2f8e869b-d290-4ea2-89f7-ead29d2a0322
X-Archives-Hash: 3f878ab8176787cb1ba54cdbb5eb0c7b

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:57:25 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> This limitation is likely just a byproduct of using a 1 lane
>> controller. If one was willing to spend a (fairly large) bit more one
>> could get a 16 lane SATA3 controller and would likely do much better
>> in terms of throughput...
>
> If you want real performance from SSD, you ditch SATA altogether and use
> a drive on a dedicated card. Of course, you're talking real money now.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> OPERATOR ERROR: Nyah, Nyah, Nyah, Nyah, Nyah!

Can you supply a link to such a solution? Just curiosity. I'm sure I
don't have the money... ;-)

- Mark