From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S0heQ-0008AC-3B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:00:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11620E0D96; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FF1E0CD9 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werp13 with SMTP id p13so1287297wer.40 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of markknecht@gmail.com designates 10.180.94.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.94.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of markknecht@gmail.com designates 10.180.94.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=markknecht@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=markknecht@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.94.68]) by 10.180.94.68 with SMTP id da4mr650814wib.22.1330037971696 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xMnmzljWoq8UlraLjPUxh87Z8GAK63etwuvdK8fs5j0=; b=tsIvcuOaocFLx02BcREAomTGDeLDM29OcYBIybb4fT7JrHIkmLdD2AfDgdkLzQd0ua 3bDFhWexh2Y2BXuhxEv15eKnWwlhgT4sOkXEMFUM2lgqs466FceKX7oIzirwtgsYGQmJ 1zJF658j/aV/4svmZCwUtxAmgskptAqsNrZRs= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.94.68 with SMTP id da4mr525837wib.22.1330037971640; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.4.154 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86 From: Mark Knecht To: Gentoo User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 66a350ee-68af-4597-8ed7-288b9b582154 X-Archives-Hash: 5188beeb0cf3edf5b727e2afa49a47ad On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong wrote: >> Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It >> always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy >> of firefox marked, in parenthesis, 32 bit.) > > They're working on it... They actually have started generating 64-bit > nightly builds for Windows and Linux: > https://nightly.mozilla.org/ What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links case my systems to barf with a "This Connection is Untrusted" message. If I remove the 's' then things work fine. Is there some part of Gentoo config that should take care of this but that I don't know about? - Mark