From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSYUF-00067j-3b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:53:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D8FE08B5; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A74E0851 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so949426qab.11 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SLfnR8GnDXkKZMHCd6MSVv7BoN8AhVO20Soe3e4kWYM=; b=jx3TEjOwA5IkK+vfz+v3+VjNmb1LAOvfVZ8zAx8MXpqnUruwwF2pxpJHnxft5P0QGX vwcqxMwiIVXTLOVa3EN+hUnfw4NpnU70cC+s9Ex1Y7qgr8CKT1LfV2cmbsFOYOI3eo+x cMFCVLLUsjdzxZYFVxOgiVZHrw4seJReVSR/IvGaPgtgwHhaWq3HCqx9aURzywCMVmMc FANYHKK01+uLYR6yuYqcCDlrUa9GVyku9e1UV6b8GUAoFRcfHCyGQypjlLBSWoLlI75s RPQYBtGAyScgqdepvTDVUVKam5KX421fhRpYr47tXXtHgUKoP1mgz6ItEYWH1WjCSCjs 6e5w== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.44.130 with SMTP id a2mr13519613qaf.66.1336675874553; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.236.136 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:51:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 1a670438-4ce9-469e-ab27-76fe6fc6c340 X-Archives-Hash: 6e1a0ff807d46b0e07749196d3cdf1cc On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Norman Invasion wrote: > On 10 May 2012 14:01, Mark Knecht wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Norman Invasion >> wrote: >>> On 9 May 2012 04:47, Dale wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As some know, I'm planning to buy me a LARGE hard drive to put all my >>>> videos on, eventually. =C2=A0The prices are coming down now. =C2=A0I k= eep seeing >>>> these "green" drives that are made by just about every company nowaday= s. >>>> =C2=A0When comparing them to a non "green" drive, do they hold up as g= ood? >>>> Are they as dependable as a plain drive? =C2=A0I guess they are more >>>> efficient and I get that but do they break quicker, more often or no >>>> difference? >>>> >>>> I have noticed that they tend to spin slower and are cheaper. =C2=A0Th= at much >>>> I have figured out. =C2=A0Other than that, I can't see any other diffe= rence. >>>> =C2=A0Data speeds seem to be about the same. >>>> >>> >>> They have an ugly tendency to nod off at 6 second intervals. >>> This runs up "193 Load_Cycle_Count" unacceptably: as many >>> as a few hundred thousand in a year & a million cycles is >>> getting close to the lifetime limit on most hard drives. =C2=A0I end >>> up running some iteration of >>> # hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda >>> every boot. >>> >> >> Very true about the 193 count. Here's a drive in a system that was >> built in Jan., 2010 so it's a bit over 2 years old at this point. It's >> on 24/7 and not rebooted except for more major updates, etc. My tests >> say the drive spins down and starts back up every 2 minutes and has >> been doing so for about 28 months. IIRC the 193 spec on this drive was >> something like 300000 max with the drive currently clocking in at >> 700488. I don't see any evidence that it's going to fail but I am >> trying to make sure it's backed up often. Being that it's gone >2x at >> this point I will swap the drive out in the early summer no matter >> what. This week I'll be visiting where the machine is so I'm going to >> put a backup drive in the box to get ready. >> > > Yes, I just learned about this problem in 2009 or so, & > checked on my FreeBSD laptop, which turned out to be > at >400000. =C2=A0It only made it another month or so before > having unrecoverable errors. > > Now, I can't conclusively demonstrate that the 193 > Load_Cycle_Count was somehow causitive, but I > gots my suspicions. =C2=A0Many of 'em highly suspectable. > It's part of the 'Wear Out Failure' part of the Bathtub Curve posted in the last few days. That said, some Toyotas go 100K miles, and others go 500K miles. Same car, same spec, same production line, different owners, different roads, different climates, etc. It's not possible to absolutely know when any drive will fail. I suspect that the 300K spec is just that, a spec. They'd replace the drive if it failed at 299,999 and wouldn't replace it at 300,001. That said, they don't want to spec thing too tightly, and I doubt many people make a purchasing decision on a spec like this, so for the vast majority of drives most likely they'd do far more than 300K. At 2 minutes per count on that specific WD Green Drive, if a home machine is turned on for instance 5 hours a day (6PM to 11PM) then 300K count equates to around 6 years. To me that seems pretty generous for a low cost home machine. However for a 24/7 production server it's a pretty fast replacement schedule. Here's data for my 500GB WD RAID Edition drives in my compute server here. It's powered down almost every night but doesn't suffer from the same firmware issues. The machine was built in April, 2010, so it's a bit of 2 years old. Note that it's been powered on less than 1/2 the number of hours but only has a 193 count of 907 vs > 700000! Cheers, Mark c2stable ~ # smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [x86_64-linux-3.2.12-gentoo] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net =3D=3D=3D START OF INFORMATION SECTION =3D=3D=3D Model Family: Western Digital RE3 Serial ATA Device Model: WDC WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 Serial Number: WD-WCASYA846988 LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2042c3477 Firmware Version: 02.03B03 User Capacity: 500,107,862,016 bytes [500 GB] Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 8 ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated Local Time is: Thu May 10 11:45:45 2012 PDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled =3D=3D=3D START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION =3D=3D=3D SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x84) Offline data collection activity was suspended by an interrupting command from host. Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabl= ed. Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine comp= leted without error or no self-test has e= ver been run. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 9480) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 112) minutes. Conveyance self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 5) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x303f) SCT Status supported. SCT Error Recovery Control supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 239 235 021 Pre-fail Always - 1050 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 935 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 000 Old_age Always - 7281 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 933 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 27 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 907 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 106 086 000 Old_age Always - 41 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0