From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A8E138010 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A39F21C0CB; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDD521C09A for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c26so3885825qad.19 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:33:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=V8thORI1/vssMzi+AF88MxDxDWMBuVTjf5anNThJfhc=; b=zCGSCjhuvbNlUVgopQSI0IaeDSxgfUQl+DJ2kaKmhVaiCRVanLWe3Y172h39Dnc+Cq RohVr7mNGOhDnMkvv747iH7pMDXhecEs51J1r4x8tnjD42p44YN8zYvSj+NlQg09t8N9 zpKx5+6XU4sR3GvuveEuLMICRhxemCJ8utlflBwQq0YYR+XP7t8c05VnG2HfDYa5CrAm iotntHKSpNYDQXnF9a9c6TrMKmtKIcsBfkFmMcbQfi8gI4ChhguNmGi0XKeEbYS26apG /PB0P2aqB9daLq8wSmT3IFYyWhWEyMfvIr4P+t+VSmvEVLbdwJeDaXTLighKlTZZ6zCs kCRw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.176.201 with SMTP id bf9mr9504231qab.80.1351197184821; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.201.22 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <50889166.2000102@fastmail.co.uk> <5088A945.5020405@fastmail.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:33:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: e6a97a2c-0138-4787-b3ee-62cbef24258a X-Archives-Hash: d488e7256c157eadba9f1cc5058f0253 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo > T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not > been proven and he himself is back in the dark. > > Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) > > Rgds, > -- I'm not an ext4 user (it's too new!) and therefore unaffected by any of this personally. However I do read lkml and have been following the thread since it started. This bug, if indeed in the end it's even determined to be a bug, is apparently pretty hard to hit. The downside is that if you did hit it the effects can be pretty devastating. I'd suggest folks consider going through the thread and not overreacting to the masking of new kernels or stuff posted on Phoronix or slashdot. It's good that the info is out there so people can make informed decisions, but one of the downsides of having all the info is the potential for people to overreact. Even with a ;-) dumping ext4 for Reiserfs might be in that camp. :-) Cheers, Mark