* [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
@ 2012-12-28 2:16 Joseph
2012-12-28 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph @ 2012-12-28 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
and I'm getting a strange error:
>>> Failed to emerge gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4, Log file:
>>> '/var/log/portage/gnome-base:gconf-2.32.4:20121228-021346.log'
>>> Jobs: 2 of 23 complete, 1 failed Load avg: 1.05, 0.61, 0.41
* Package: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
* Repository: gentoo
* Maintainer: gnome@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 elibc_glibc gtk introspection kernel_linux ldap policykit userland_GNU
* FEATURES: sandbox
ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
ACCESS DENIED unlink: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
(gconftool-2:24669): GConf-WARNING **: None of the resolved addresses are writable; saving configuration settings will not be possible
* Fixing OMF Makefiles ...
[ ok ]
* Disabling deprecation warnings ...
[ ok ]
* Running elibtoolize in: GConf-2.32.4/
* Applying portage/1.2.0 patch ...
* Applying sed/1.5.6 patch ...
* Applying as-needed/2.2.6 patch ...
* Applying gconf-2.24.0-no-gconfd.patch ...
[ ok ]
* Applying gconf-2.28.0-entry-set-value-sigsegv.patch ...
[ ok ]
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---------------------------
LOG FILE "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-24640.log"
VERSION 1.0
FORMAT: F - Function called
FORMAT: S - Access Status
FORMAT: P - Path as passed to function
FORMAT: A - Absolute Path (not canonical)
FORMAT: R - Canonical Path
FORMAT: C - Command Line
F: open_wr
S: deny
P: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
A: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
R: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
C: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 --shutdown
F: unlink
S: deny
P: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
A: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
R: /root/.gconf/.testing.writeability
C: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 --shutdown
--
Joseph
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 2:16 [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable Joseph
@ 2012-12-28 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
2012-12-28 2:34 ` Joseph
2012-12-28 2:39 ` Joseph
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2012-12-28 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo User
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph <syscon780@gmail.com> wrote:
> trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
> and I'm getting a strange error:
<SNIP>
>
> --
> Joseph
>
Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
time, 6:21PM as I write this)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2012-12-28 2:34 ` Joseph
2012-12-28 3:38 ` Bruce Hill
2012-12-28 2:39 ` Joseph
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph @ 2012-12-28 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 12/27/12 18:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph <syscon780@gmail.com> wrote:
>> trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
>> and I'm getting a strange error:
><SNIP>
>>
>> --
>> Joseph
>>
>Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
>times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
>mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
>time, 6:21PM as I write this)
>
Looking at the package list:
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd
gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank space.
gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to rebuild it only, but since it is not available it fails.
--
Joseph
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
2012-12-28 2:34 ` Joseph
@ 2012-12-28 2:39 ` Joseph
2012-12-28 3:07 ` Mark Knecht
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joseph @ 2012-12-28 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 12/27/12 18:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Joseph <syscon780@gmail.com> wrote:
>> trying to emerge: gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4
>> and I'm getting a strange error:
><SNIP>
>>
>> --
>> Joseph
>>
>Saw the same thing here this morning, and have seen it a couple of
>times in the past. My strategy is to sync tomorrow and try again or
>mask the package if you need to move forward tonight. (California
>time, 6:21PM as I write this)
It is a bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448952
--
Joseph
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 2:39 ` Joseph
@ 2012-12-28 3:07 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2012-12-28 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Yeah, bugs happen. Like I said, wait a day and try again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 2:34 ` Joseph
@ 2012-12-28 3:38 ` Bruce Hill
2012-12-28 11:54 ` Bruce Hill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Hill @ 2012-12-28 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:34:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
>
> Looking at the package list:
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd
>
> gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank space.
> gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to rebuild it only, but since it is not available it fails.
>
> --
> Joseph
mingdao@workstation ~ $ eshowkw gnome-base/gconf
Keywords for gnome-base/gconf:
| | u |
| a a p s | n |
| l m h i m m p s p | u s | r
| p d a p a 6 i p c 3 a x | s l | e
| h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
| a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
----------+---------------------------+-----+-------
[I]2.32.4 | + + + o + o ~ + + o + + + | o 2 | gentoo
3.2.5 | ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo
--
Happy Penguin Computers >')
126 Fenco Drive ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
support@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 3:38 ` Bruce Hill
@ 2012-12-28 11:54 ` Bruce Hill
2012-12-28 14:07 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Hill @ 2012-12-28 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:38:38PM -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:34:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the package list:
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/gnome-base/gconf?arches=fbsd
> >
> > gnome-base/gconf is not mark stable or testing at all, there is a blank space.
> > gconf-2.32.4 was already installed on my system, emerge is trying to rebuild it only, but since it is not available it fails.
> >
> > --
> > Joseph
>
> mingdao@workstation ~ $ eshowkw gnome-base/gconf
> Keywords for gnome-base/gconf:
> | | u |
> | a a p s | n |
> | l m h i m m p s p | u s | r
> | p d a p a 6 i p c 3 a x | s l | e
> | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
> | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
> ----------+---------------------------+-----+-------
> [I]2.32.4 | + + + o + o ~ + + o + + + | o 2 | gentoo
> 3.2.5 | ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ | o | gentoo
Sorry for replying to my own; must have deleted OP.
This morning's world update only wanted to rebuild gconf because they made the
gtk dep optional and dropped the doc USE:
[ebuild R ] gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4:2 USE="gtk%* introspection -debug -ldap -policykit (-doc%)" 0 kB
It was still listed the same by eshowkw in portage, after eix-sync; and it
built with no problems here.
Are you still having a problem with this?
--
Happy Penguin Computers >')
126 Fenco Drive ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
support@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable
2012-12-28 11:54 ` Bruce Hill
@ 2012-12-28 14:07 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2012-12-28 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo User
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Bruce Hill
<daddy@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> Sorry for replying to my own; must have deleted OP.
>
> This morning's world update only wanted to rebuild gconf because they made the
> gtk dep optional and dropped the doc USE:
>
> [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gconf-2.32.4:2 USE="gtk%* introspection -debug -ldap -policykit (-doc%)" 0 kB
>
> It was still listed the same by eshowkw in portage, after eix-sync; and it
> built with no problems here.
>
> Are you still having a problem with this?
It's fine here also. I expect the OP will be fine also.
Like I said yesterday, bugs happen. Wait a day. They get fixed.
This sandbox violation seems to show up maybe once a year? Don't know
why but it gets fixed fast.
Cheers,
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-28 14:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-28 2:16 [gentoo-user] gconf - failed: not writable Joseph
2012-12-28 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
2012-12-28 2:34 ` Joseph
2012-12-28 3:38 ` Bruce Hill
2012-12-28 11:54 ` Bruce Hill
2012-12-28 14:07 ` Mark Knecht
2012-12-28 2:39 ` Joseph
2012-12-28 3:07 ` Mark Knecht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox