public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library?
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:07:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK2H+ecq2u3=+6MsVB9E=BBaLXFiWtMniG3Z429TZROizEH5_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2qdGXtBn5p3CuWhhOMJq5pvT57Gt6WWvzV7K9dCPLnc_qdZA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>
> On Dec 25, 2012 10:44 PM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>>    With the previous local drive I used ext3 and have had no problems.
>> I'm just wondering if there's a better choice & why.
<SNIP>
>
> For your usage, I think ext3 is the most suitable.
>
> Do you have another fs in mind?

Really, no. ext3 has been fine. I didn't see any real advantage to
ext4 myself. Florian offers the removal argument but I've never
removed files from this database. It's just movies so the systems just
grows over time.

I suppose I wondered whether some other filesystem might get through
an fsck _much_ faster. This machine gets shut down in the evening so
fsck operations happen roughly once a month. At times I need to get up
and running in the morning and get held up behind an fsck after so
many days.

Other than that I don't have any real issues, and presupposing that
ext3 would be my final choice I put it on and started rsyncing the
files, but if another answer is really better I have no problems with
blowing that away and starting again.

Thanks,
Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-25 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-25 15:41 [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library? Mark Knecht
2012-12-25 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-12-25 17:07   ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2012-12-25 17:18     ` Michael Orlitzky
2012-12-25 17:56       ` Dale
2012-12-25 18:26       ` Mark Knecht
2012-12-25 18:58         ` Florian Philipp
2012-12-25 16:46 ` Florian Philipp
2012-12-25 17:15   ` Dale
2012-12-25 19:04     ` Florian Philipp
2012-12-25 19:45       ` Dale
2012-12-25 20:09 ` Marc Stürmer
2012-12-27  0:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-12-27 10:01   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2012-12-27 13:57   ` Michael Hampicke
2012-12-27 22:48     ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-02 13:04   ` Neil Bothwick
2013-01-02 13:38     ` Alan McKinnon
2013-01-02 14:08       ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2013-01-02 14:39         ` Neil Bothwick
2012-12-27  0:44 ` Alecks Gates

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK2H+ecq2u3=+6MsVB9E=BBaLXFiWtMniG3Z429TZROizEH5_w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=markknecht@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox