From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143005-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682411381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:23:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01EA021C044;
Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:22:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7994921C005
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id r4so956653qaq.19
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:21:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=he0GIxQ5CCxYuqkO9WreWVk5MP/aSFls/+vlyQ7ZMJM=;
b=MBNmk6uLsugcZtSXqDnuzpk4speoMlP+rmHMgxrP8QLBbd02zhwp87JeUYVBhR/rfc
nPxrb8dH+qcXkQA+iygCsBHdm/tEAWa6laWp+vQK5TZu3ztsqG6HM+rPObGpbgXbyRqK
gUd3w0L5UjHzBzSYv3M75Gxha/otOmMbo5BhZ8YdFv6hyoOi47x1olAT/prInR4Kkfbn
F2Rws9k9y41co7cbNF63IO6YoNI+7iM7Xrv6np26CVkgbzqn0bCH9Dt+0TZ42QIjDIoy
F0ZJbCH+xUr3bA9aWLMs2gsZSNIlDB8lsl1/taTb/d9GuMBKoIpzhVutHSvYB5/O4vMg
sjrQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.75.226 with SMTP id f2mr15808577qew.43.1354490472516; Sun,
02 Dec 2012 15:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.186.132 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:21:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <k9gg07$9gl$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <k9eghg$4fm$1@ger.gmane.org>
<1540977.IXnsEoOt74@dethkomp>
<201212020806.55695.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
<13627.1354447432@ccs.covici.com>
<k9gca3$esj$2@ger.gmane.org>
<CAK2H+efvPsm0ByDUUZ2vS2O14fE0B9O-euq78tRHkT2t4X1ZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<k9gg07$9gl$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:21:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2H+ecQybHR3LSzmj6ZsRAZiVx=JEsCJyWPVVhRD4jdfTZXDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel 3.2->3.5 upgrade unusable: keyboard borked
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: ac406220-56d5-4fbd-9a3e-423a8261688f
X-Archives-Hash: 5dc1733d5ac8c27972f557e049a92ece
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-12-02, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>> /etc/init.d/numlock on/off will change the state of the lights on my
>> keyboard. Have you tried that?
>
> On my system it's start/stop rather than on/off. You can also just use
> the setleds utility directly, but either is hard to do,
Yes, of course you're right about start/stop. I was just writing a
response from memory and stupidly not testing anything. Anyway, you
got the idea.
Glad you found the kernel dev thread and reported the info back. Thanks!
Cheers,
Mark