Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk
> <mailto:neil@digimed.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 May 2016 21:54:09 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> > thanks a lot. My eyes are bleeding.
>
> Serves you right for being daft enough to read it again!
>
> I'd suggest that Alan RTFM for the commands he uses, but that
> would be a
> waste of keystrokes.
>
>
> I have to agree with ng0
>
> WOW!
>
> Alan just wants to start it and walk away, as if Gentoo was a binary
> distribution
> that handles it all upstream. He doesn't want to take the time to
> review what
> emerge is proposing and see if changes are needed first.
You know what? fuck you. That's what.
The update list it's proposing is 403 packages, or roughly 25% of my
system.
> Hey Alan: Gentoo is NOT a start an update and walk away setup. Some human
> mind needs to be involved if troubles arise. Also, read make.conf(5)
> and set up
> the various variables correctly; PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET should only have
> one python version set.
DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK I'M THAT STUPID??? SERIOUSLY????
> Furthermore, the current portage doesn't require the revdep-rebuild
> step because
> of the @preserved-rebuild set creation.
That missfeature is incompatible with how I use my system. I have not
reformatted my hard drive in six years.
The principle way I accomplish that is by prohibiting the growth of
cruft in the system. I cannot tolerate the accumulation of back versions
anywhere in the system except where absolutely necessary. So if it is
possible to re-build broken packages against new versions, I demand that
take place
as quickly as possible such that the system is left in the most pristine
and self-consistent state possible. --- secret of immortality, dude. =\
Gentoo used to be superlatively excellent at that.
> In any case, to try and force things through without looking at what
> problems are occuring
> is just (excuse my language) batshit crazy stupid.
You
dumb.
shit.
You literally have no fucking clue do you?