From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49161396D0 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C58B1E0DD0; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58403E0D77 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m18so2638108wrm.2 for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 05:39:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NFsR5ShfB+RDRL1AOfCsdNqCHDJwVWnayh0zoYD1TkY=; b=p0JewbboprIK3VslzWvxhWINEKMFPLoRz5ZhyipbSwUYdTs8GhWnUJcFrK8EgLHIv+ YDbHW788MK89WoYBKICgB74NOCOcJtxQaj/VmR99kjT8jlUopP/gwBNDEHf8oAD84Uvb bzsMP1+fOxjBicqfVsyA6r87qJw/s+6SPUEf9E4pVOoKHQyP6Esp+8iwXzJNz6pomQPJ WiYKcRcG+Ja6bM933SougVePRpXbTs0BhEqG6ubEb3s90csWLoV7EnuX6b09owg2axAc jFqL+1xkHr4QZKqHYxytuQilkNWLq0N5R2L8rK6SwahEAmD1QtBHmpRN849XkTCHVhec sN1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NFsR5ShfB+RDRL1AOfCsdNqCHDJwVWnayh0zoYD1TkY=; b=gXmFYBsKxaMQO53F+BMoIbSR/3TnHLRbrkJoqTho5SzsS01yD+GWPeS1hDXD9w+OA1 P/5Ra2RSGLc9ou0VFE2CS7RLGPW1u7KNl8+YGp6txsUvcXfbPCFxY8P+8tgwvzQGzwIt RCRnZ3/IIvY8DdpXaSz3HYdEaWBGGiZkFhRGKSLF8xktkEAi+9taXdEb1uiLx9LcaLzS YaZqBhb8Wc5q2bGJ2I+SCrYbcck9eXZ9loF6EPAvDFxTx8FVFP9M89WPmkAC4/rsfhdF kNGZ0autzRZqxCcMbPkKc8+T5LrAEpWd8ZPbECgJi5eqsHBvZJIhKaMkV9P6fW0pO8W6 rEPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUilT0WluZTWvdrQJ/+Eui5Z9VFs4KxbDXKs3YeEFIxOgFqcE8gC m60EmNFJN/gbbw75dqqA7+KDLLROig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4qsURQ+ap/yPxhxPLaPnaVcFXNn1wQWSSbEfZngMmvqzrms2W0CzMNsl6GMF39cDAAy8uPl3dJzyHjfqu9cFY= X-Received: by 10.223.177.134 with SMTP id q6mr2225928wra.3.1504787979825; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 05:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.59.131 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com> From: konsolebox Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:38:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about Firefox 57? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 823954b4-d8a8-48d9-aa8a-367c5bae84fe X-Archives-Hash: 0b7906a0ac5f8e9db03df2597ed22e7f On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE wrote: > Afterwards I found that it seems Firefox 57 will use a new ecosystem for > extensions and be more strict for plugin developers. > > So Firefox gurus, what do you think about it? Not a guru, but if it's something that enhances add-on security without sacrificing flexibility, I don't mind. -- konsolebox