From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-179830-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49161396D0
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C58B1E0DD0;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58403E0D77
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m18so2638108wrm.2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 05:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=NFsR5ShfB+RDRL1AOfCsdNqCHDJwVWnayh0zoYD1TkY=;
b=p0JewbboprIK3VslzWvxhWINEKMFPLoRz5ZhyipbSwUYdTs8GhWnUJcFrK8EgLHIv+
YDbHW788MK89WoYBKICgB74NOCOcJtxQaj/VmR99kjT8jlUopP/gwBNDEHf8oAD84Uvb
bzsMP1+fOxjBicqfVsyA6r87qJw/s+6SPUEf9E4pVOoKHQyP6Esp+8iwXzJNz6pomQPJ
WiYKcRcG+Ja6bM933SougVePRpXbTs0BhEqG6ubEb3s90csWLoV7EnuX6b09owg2axAc
jFqL+1xkHr4QZKqHYxytuQilkNWLq0N5R2L8rK6SwahEAmD1QtBHmpRN849XkTCHVhec
sN1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=NFsR5ShfB+RDRL1AOfCsdNqCHDJwVWnayh0zoYD1TkY=;
b=gXmFYBsKxaMQO53F+BMoIbSR/3TnHLRbrkJoqTho5SzsS01yD+GWPeS1hDXD9w+OA1
P/5Ra2RSGLc9ou0VFE2CS7RLGPW1u7KNl8+YGp6txsUvcXfbPCFxY8P+8tgwvzQGzwIt
RCRnZ3/IIvY8DdpXaSz3HYdEaWBGGiZkFhRGKSLF8xktkEAi+9taXdEb1uiLx9LcaLzS
YaZqBhb8Wc5q2bGJ2I+SCrYbcck9eXZ9loF6EPAvDFxTx8FVFP9M89WPmkAC4/rsfhdF
kNGZ0autzRZqxCcMbPkKc8+T5LrAEpWd8ZPbECgJi5eqsHBvZJIhKaMkV9P6fW0pO8W6
rEPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUilT0WluZTWvdrQJ/+Eui5Z9VFs4KxbDXKs3YeEFIxOgFqcE8gC
m60EmNFJN/gbbw75dqqA7+KDLLROig==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4qsURQ+ap/yPxhxPLaPnaVcFXNn1wQWSSbEfZngMmvqzrms2W0CzMNsl6GMF39cDAAy8uPl3dJzyHjfqu9cFY=
X-Received: by 10.223.177.134 with SMTP id q6mr2225928wra.3.1504787979825;
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 05:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.59.131 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com>
From: konsolebox <konsolebox@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:38:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJnmqwY2kmE10JCaH9uHPMyXgE4ahvGOU1fYQZPpO1dQ2nAVnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about Firefox 57?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 823954b4-d8a8-48d9-aa8a-367c5bae84fe
X-Archives-Hash: 0b7906a0ac5f8e9db03df2597ed22e7f
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@gmail.com> wrote:
> Afterwards I found that it seems Firefox 57 will use a new ecosystem for
> extensions and be more strict for plugin developers.
>
> So Firefox gurus, what do you think about it?
Not a guru, but if it's something that enhances add-on security
without sacrificing flexibility, I don't mind.
--
konsolebox