From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769CD158094 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1A43E091C; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C176E08DD for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id q16so301657ljh.4 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=mL5b/YCtPwAp/8ZLbQkmDGNhkuc5Su6IXIJATNRLwf0=; b=lU28tQ08+66iHoEDkoAXiPKzNNcixdQp9O1uZuXuaZWNy0UX7JgzSTwZecleOxsYwa ZoiAVSzk52+ZdK5ZKR6ExnXjgdXctspkwJ2CYl//7QezqUUZkF4W09yZFk64d1xwpoU5 bOvbDWBFvWxium2XBIvqTUGJzPkHLB/cnMvqeJgFdjJKFZnHZbYy0/VFAtPCoHIkr15w xDobTEuv1l3ccBipEsoirpSXtfEPp7k1p1Vcf6HOOhAaDMQEGT840f9plePSC/xQIOhw qhw3eTp081CczJponR2QdL8/NnxmNy/SlQjxsLvwYGeYRBdeEWhm+Uh51XzGxVtm8McE H+FA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=mL5b/YCtPwAp/8ZLbQkmDGNhkuc5Su6IXIJATNRLwf0=; b=yJR809EZ/ABbrj834A7yElgbmh7ECy0S79ZzrdppqTERBfcnFL5WZOtkXNB6HeOtZz D2nTynRxy+hjef0duRzs9LioA8swzaWAYWKQiL1BMRh5LBIL4H9bBb9QkK2OCDQfeP+j 5oasUF7uazLtXWKLgCqDmMg0XycKst/oNW+gRtO8KcUW5YP7unM/UInceyYEBlOgSKOq 0I+TMfi58WycEWUgngcsG0oOpqTqLFpqI9hxrWxUU61RqdO4AhSJPebp5iB5fzaTiQLY +Rl6OQAB+TzWdcnCh8y/dtXBKH3hMmzow5BKl9m6t1jYSa0mPt+OCSVQHCowhwdkIPRB LFcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1YMCRN3t32+AYH6Q5O8cr5OK8n44H3EmWI3HCZbOusZC557zAL t5vos3xEyog/PGOvWKRJGt/KxzMadVHlaVIDrdLItqhI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5ykPO7w3LlZDHv7JcKVvTlecu03sdeH0I+jOs8dG2R7SbzufIBukVc2AmmfCMsPUkRz+/WjdDYY2P85zSK8k0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1786:b0:26d:aaec:1487 with SMTP id bn6-20020a05651c178600b0026daaec1487mr7713893ljb.287.1664870564194; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 01:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221004064007.1cb2b136@op.pl> In-Reply-To: <20221004064007.1cb2b136@op.pl> From: Arve Barsnes Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:02:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] x11-base/xorg-x11 masked To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: bda106ac-56d2-43f5-a57f-48487a34fa50 X-Archives-Hash: ced92cb5d9f819639f23905f74615976 On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 08:41, wkuz@op.pl wrote: > > Hello everyone! > Upon upgrade, portage told me that x11-base/xorg-x11 is masked and will > be removed from the repo on November 1st. I thought "ok, why not do it > now", so I have typed: > # emerge -W x11-base/xorg-x11 > # emerge -cav > and there was a surprise (not a pleasant one). Since xorg-x11 is a > metapackage it pulled so many things I would like to have still here. > Is there any reasonable way to put all those packages to my world file, > so I can easily remove xorg-x11 without deleting half of my desktop > apps? Are you sure that you would miss any of them? From the lists on the bugs posted by Holger here, it seems like most of it are small specialised tools used for specific needs. If you don't know that you explicitly use them, you probably don't. The proposed meta package for the to-be-removed fonts is a different matter, but I don't know how much use those fonts get in practice, might be worth following that bug for info. Regards, Arve