From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E8A8158020 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 05:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31BD6E097A; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 05:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2C5E0966 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 05:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w74so9892276oie.0 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:19:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0wY6rbS6bf/K0IrT3n8wuJqcuH0C6x/ICE6A66tSwhs=; b=f/LqCTt2HbZzfFWybZdURkZTflP2zS3uuRI63yGwHr9+dNrraYfsAEmuycJYT+IIAQ h+yFr1O1ewLdiUucExPDOLC0/+thf2yrlSSbA4v4wcGh5uhnZ9ltln+8y/zzSRy9zUMR fxwacsBszNjP+jFP8QO9J8KIx5iNT5pydH4RKc8TVlwL3FS828TNDnZS2h2TqrR1oT53 ns3GkldUXKVnfp5+pWhITkW1nBFaLFF7QrR/ZGBee2yZ0kIT9HRMAKzUOHFnfH1pBP/i JMFuF8CaLLQGcszVaQxodYAbu1jbFown5OYOvnrHhMiZBBja54Y50y2fEyRKoIegZvC8 OuJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0wY6rbS6bf/K0IrT3n8wuJqcuH0C6x/ICE6A66tSwhs=; b=auuHbZNQrqPZAgNqQxvkzl/Kac7dzQVwXjGVOlw75onNHVOqse0Krz1mgDHvhFe7Pu YVHKAR9B16PyIeG92zR7LA476VxQIuoxW19ZUmvAqzw1XWQ0NjTcdPtREI/TDD/gADHU vT5IgAuAA6EsEV5AOipU/xYOC2K/XnRVq+Gp13ed/GMPARCEKu8x60fvG2R+HHqQUMNn CR/k7bkXjzrnZ7QNc7XVDkg35k+Cjn4Z9LCszZ5JrgrGFDjSmkx2rCkC6v1/XQAfTgyy iL370HmieODwI7/gDaIwd8dmCIHPv0qVYUX63zTwAQ7u2D/OAq/pmHy2Ss2M1VHOTjzb qO+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3aNISF26r7KXIo/3F55gfjZD548FEpK3Nyl4NFfUXtHVfZdGu6 mjLX+dCmVrl6RQxHPvITAUm40q43TBrG6kNg9E66s9H1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5A8zPjUj56d1Tp2t0JX8iwYo03/rO65a+dwy0DxN2lzTTCqzzKTfs2awPNM6vSXR3n8Wneucv7WVz/S5z4jAw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1391:b0:350:e93b:a4b4 with SMTP id c17-20020a056808139100b00350e93ba4b4mr1271704oiw.199.1665551949994; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2150948.NgBsaNRSFp@lenovo.localdomain> In-Reply-To: From: Arve Barsnes Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] problems emerging some ruby packages To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 083d5c3b-033f-4b13-9cce-65ba0c3597c8 X-Archives-Hash: d24ce3df531fd90661c04c26c6b8143c On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 02:12, Jack wrote: > As I said in my reply to Neil, why would this happen in just a handful > of packages, but not in over thirty others? mini_mime is the other > problem package, and it does not use ruby_add_bdepend so there is only > one line with USE_RUBY: 'USE_RUBY="ruby26 ruby27 ruby30 ruby31"'. > > So - why is ruby31 disabled for (so far) only these two packages? > (The other packages which are failing depend on one of these two.) Maybe these two are just written more strict? I'm unable to read the eclass to determine how it masks these flags on a stable system on these packages, it will happily install it with ruby31 on my unstable system, but you can try to unmask the flag in /etc/portage/package.use.mask dev-ruby/thor -ruby_targets_ruby31 Not the minus sign. Regards, Arve