From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-199749-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580D4158094
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 21:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5055AE09DB;
Fri, 30 Sep 2022 21:16:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa1-x2e.google.com (mail-oa1-x2e.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2e])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D39E08AD
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa1-x2e.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-11e9a7135easo6872792fac.6
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:from:to:cc:subject:date;
bh=NLkV9zO+oFdCEXzMdyw+mvQxlj3JAqY7hPehpMh1n84=;
b=eMp29iJry8taJG5q7ihe6prf/fwDt7eUXq8ZB3i1vG6V6IpHE/Fy69z1TMIJ45zRTv
9Nk/R7NER7RTOhJOUDIrgLR9yUmCNkwqisFHQz1FTO4nW+xOnRVWdMUU5h63fEbQfoyX
iwuojnWHHGjmLjNCUF3I0NrnYLiM6mgBlGVRo+WxiJluWhMx64SPhZW9vS69P8lLwuhq
tuOqNJ2a/N4Vr/9EQ+vaO7dUZj/kEk+uDwi32AR+eb8UP0UJX+hQVN+xFGdRRx9zEbhc
eg+I5O62iWaC+6XpkI/VXkd048Yo8fC5e6XgS65uYWBsMt39bRlwYN7wYzuTT5o1H7YO
idcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date;
bh=NLkV9zO+oFdCEXzMdyw+mvQxlj3JAqY7hPehpMh1n84=;
b=1zwxkZUJ5TVeHsgd2QuPr2Fbw6vfF9bzRgfuypvZdMGgJA/WiR2r4JDKpRjs/x4pFo
LsPeSMZ7KVV0CN6xc61hqjNBqVyvN+F5WIMaalww2AF2qiwRIR5JGr6ImmJLZkArds4t
c51AyihU/nxHJDZx/53yEcq9GaAeudKtMk2A1pPvVEPUOs0HYHNEAAetN3pAyo6Aum7a
o6ifDXlZG5dpsYH72VA2ZgEN/aDeyS8I9L5Fb9IwzS9Lk0B3Uh292yyOa5ps6md1X5t0
FR5TQSMZlOJEA16BcHoh4G4sJpjY38HvoZfzZq6KwUrY8Xio2TEshMqKwpX4PGvy1Wcl
n9yA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1oOp0A1aQvwwofJn9G/t93aEHu6j+M2nKgzEyt1bEj0eezlinv
YfCcS8O2qrvYE0DKWcm4h6OJFw0xjwoZTIbX5Os0kVvB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6SIXILHqy76+vzkX250OzUf85nNhSBvx3OeSb/XKLV+ctLCgk9PcA2iKfsQtyS3eVO42Rdpy4xlOK1QdGHgS0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f724:b0:132:13d0:7689 with SMTP id
ej36-20020a056870f72400b0013213d07689mr76755oab.17.1664572587093; Fri, 30 Sep
2022 14:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m3v8p4d7je.wl-covici@ccs.covici.com> <CAJjrzcVWn+vTZXX3-oFqrR=_gp=7GgAEwTAuJFoy-f7YS74fqg@mail.gmail.com>
<6c8598d8-3b9d-286d-9300-635cf9d90bf0@youngman.org.uk> <42044d38854c4ebc5f098d9bee94e17907e1a6c2.camel@connell.tech>
<9e075ec6-8222-51f2-01ee-3f52f2066d5d@youngman.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9e075ec6-8222-51f2-01ee-3f52f2066d5d@youngman.org.uk>
From: Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 23:16:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJjrzcUkOSAdxC+d40ngdB5gkArQdC-nmVAT5Vqnv36Tz6vpWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] problem with emerge depclean after world update
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 9a5ad25e-05ae-47bc-8de4-54f6f0fc5c1d
X-Archives-Hash: 41d2c2cb3644a30686672a07c54ef267
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 22:27, Wol <antlists@youngman.org.uk> wrote:
> Does that mean an update typically cleans a replaced package
> automagically? I thought that usually they got left behind and that was
> why you needed depclean - to remove all the old versions?
>
> Certainly that's what I remember of depclean of old - the list of stuff
> being cleaned was mostly old versions of what was installed.
I don't remember that, although my memory might be less than stellar.
Unless a package is slotted, an update replaces the old version, and
hence nothing to depclean.
Cheers,
Arve