From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142132-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E813138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E262621C050;
	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:41:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D12AE059B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x40so752043qcp.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=64GkhhhB25lRj7PBkI9HkDE9SjMqVu0/ofp7YHmXy1w=;
        b=SuuvPrex4Zu3vUGW2qbr0Hy6fcoOrS0sS0thrMNOF1ExSOrbqHlZZ17R2GwAvAwH7H
         74N8ELqeLU8h7ddT0TjCZsGjO/ei9vSy7eC9dnblHw+uryxj95hvNrwxQoLoNJXOaITy
         vUxjhVZL2vYdS+CqvAOsLjMcvNRGaFozThaRCzRdc4UkvPaUVBoNsmfx/XNzaxP0JWhp
         Cjq+E0G/PuMAnM8IrQTWKVciRjc+UGNFxLrzqXi0e2P2IpBwrnb9JoesGrgjJJHS68E4
         VeEub8Jlw+OyoNDfVqZoo/8Y+eNFipuFBGJjoaNy3sFcwzD4xoVgKsuHt70M+4Tz6gGf
         0b6A==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.187.198 with SMTP id cx6mr9061463qab.56.1351172443487;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.59.49 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201210251037.02631.robert.david.public@gmail.com>
References: <201210242036.54720.pfrank@gmx.de>
	<201210251037.02631.robert.david.public@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:40:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJPsZzdCsO_=af_ekVETMyeJsOKDH5zT-cYEnd+sJ1XqSfOQzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Network perf tool
From: Ryan Decker <rdecker@siena.edu>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm2YGrIfdbkF9KCc48O4X7tGjy9AQo5CIaLMz9BOLaWY5DxRkQTAZh0vieAXPa6UO8EYp2
X-Archives-Salt: df037824-3075-4679-a473-1de92436c416
X-Archives-Hash: 74e2fb911d14350811644a48dcf98db8

I second iperf for network performance testing.... I've used it
countless times, and does just what it claims to do.

Ryan


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Robert David
<robert.david.public@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Patric,
>
> what about iperf?
>
> Robert.
>
>
> On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 20:36:54 Petric Frank wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask
>> otherwise.
>>
>> Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as
>> defined in RFC 2544 ?
>> This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be
>> connected to the device under test.
>>
>> regards
>>   Petric
>