From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-158690-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2F13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:33:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2544CE09C4;
	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f65.google.com (mail-la0-f65.google.com [209.85.215.65])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BBFE09BC
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:33:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f65.google.com with SMTP id gi9so274009lab.8
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=9TZc8ZwgZrmfhsD1a/WI+zuIp92JRh4F4NiE3cPZ038=;
        b=biPg7NECCjpUr95+QI5YNLV6rs9jSncRW4HpmrwHsLUqjNIQ3vIglT+YXrurF5Qel5
         R5631C4qi/ySivO0oE+sf50TWW2E17OuqcDCkIKZksdG7B9J3Jr5spqZxOiFbXrCoJBv
         b1AOcGFKCFc5nNLeEdSgiX5wIxycsAbLDdDBfP1OCqD0WupnWK6Y0jg+c6y7KHrwX7lI
         kem9kHknX3QSWawRqM49eFgaQ67qP1SXMTaFS5D04nhUfefn3sr9c//y+wvF6mwOYW2h
         jFwBudOaaiwGoyX7bE5aBV0mDnkyWwSICHM77jyn2/zkT27Dok4/do5m7w2VqXGLIp6Q
         fx4Q==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.18.199 with SMTP id y7mr41500928lad.0.1410924808911;
 Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.128.195 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5418CF8F.9050506@gentoo.org>
References: <CAJ1xhMUJD9ezs2fwcSB2imMi5OXS=jiQXxWuDar9CDbiEkBYsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54186029.3020209@gentoo.org>
	<CAJ1xhMV-ePUdxxqYdYcR4J9gbrvkxNCn5TPJnj=4iMp-bXJSdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5418CF8F.9050506@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:33:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJ1xhMXb1vZD1Ywbdj_z3rPPuGvozuJcyvgea+jzcjLUy3v3Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]
From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 6fafa9d9-56d9-4e36-84b5-eb1652faca26
X-Archives-Hash: 61b59610a858f822ea26768c61caf15c

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 12:39 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>> Replacing brightness with power in XFCE_PLUGINS, followed by running
>> 'emerge -avuND @world', still tried to downgrade the package in
>> question.
>>
>> I then ran 'emerge -avuND '>xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1'
>> which suggested adding '=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.4.0 ~x86' to
>> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.
>>
>> I did that, followed by running 'emerge -avuND @world', which pulled
>> in xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.4.0.
>>
>
> Did you have 1.3.1 keyworded? Because it was ~x86 also when it was removed.
>
>
>

Yes, I did have this stanza, '=xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1
~x86', in my /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.