[gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

I'm following the documentation here:

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv

to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild. The docs only provide an 
actual example for the global hook case (/etc/portage/bashrc), but it 
says it works the same way on a per-ebuild basis using /etc/portage/env. 
But it is totally silent on how to actually do that :-/

So I assume, since the docs don't mention anything special, that I 
should put the code in a conf file. So I created this file:

   /etc/portage/env/test.conf

and in it:

   if [ "${EBUILD_PHASE}" == "postinst" ];
   then
       echo ":: TEST"
   fi

Then I added this line to /etc/portage/package.env:

   app-misc/mc test.conf

But when I "emerge app-misc/mc", I get:

!!! Problem in 'app-misc/mc' dependencies.
!!! "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=') 
portage.exception
... done!
"/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')

I don't get it... Can't I have a per-package bashrc or something? The 
docs are suggesting that I can, but don't tell me how.

Re: [gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Michael Orlitzky]

On 10/20/2015 10:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I'm following the documentation here:
> 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv
> 
> to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild.

Deja vu:

  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devhelp/151

  https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388781

There's two separate uses for /etc/portage/env -- one of them will get
you the make.conf parser (when you list the file in
/etc/portage/package.env) and the other that will get you the bash
parser (when you put the file at /etc/portage/env/${CATEGORY}/${PN}).

The whole thing is confusing. If you ever get it working please put a
decent example on the wiki because I remember spending hours trying to
do the same thing.

[gentoo-user] Re: How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 20/10/15 17:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 10:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> I'm following the documentation here:
>>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv
>>
>> to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild.
>
> Deja vu:
>
>    http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devhelp/151
>
>    https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388781
>
> There's two separate uses for /etc/portage/env -- one of them will get
> you the make.conf parser (when you list the file in
> /etc/portage/package.env) and the other that will get you the bash
> parser (when you put the file at /etc/portage/env/${CATEGORY}/${PN}).
>
> The whole thing is confusing. If you ever get it working please put a
> decent example on the wiki because I remember spending hours trying to
> do the same thing.

As suggested by Neil, putting the code in /etc/portage/env/app-misc/mc 
worked.

Will later write an example in the Wiki.

Re: [gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Alan McKinnon]

On 20/10/2015 16:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 10:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> I'm following the documentation here:
>>
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv
>>
>> to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild.
> 
> Deja vu:
> 
>   http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devhelp/151
> 
>   https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388781
> 
> There's two separate uses for /etc/portage/env -- one of them will get
> you the make.conf parser (when you list the file in
> /etc/portage/package.env) and the other that will get you the bash
> parser (when you put the file at /etc/portage/env/${CATEGORY}/${PN}).
> 
> The whole thing is confusing. If you ever get it working please put a
> decent example on the wiki because I remember spending hours trying to
> do the same thing.


I had to go down this road too recently. The portage man pages mention
the two ways and recommend the completely non-obvious one that melted my
brain. It works like this:

$ cat /etc/portage/package.env
=app-emulation/virtualbox-5.0.6 vbox-makeopts
=app-emulation/virtualbox-5.0.6-r1 vbox-makeopts

$ cat /etc/portage/env/vbox-makeopts
MAKEOPTS="-j2 -l4"

All the atoms listed in package.env (2 virtual box ebuilds in this case)
will apply the environment settings in a file called vbox-makeopts. I
had to do this because virtualbox-5 has a weird parallel build bug - it
often fails with j=1 or j>2 but never with j=2. Odd.


The other method is very obvious but somehow not recommended:

$ ls -l /etc/portage/env/mail-client
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 92 Sep 25 17:00 thunderbird-38.2.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 92 Oct  1 14:52 thunderbird-38.3.0

$ cat /etc/portage/env/mail-client/thunderbird-38.2.0
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/thunderbird,-rpath,/usr/lib/thunderbird/components"


The dir and version structure of env/<pkg>-<version> is compared to
what is being merged (IIRC $P, $PN, $PV all work) and the env in the
file is applied.



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] Re: How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 20/10/15 17:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> The whole thing is confusing. If you ever get it working please put a
> decent example on the wiki because I remember spending hours trying to
> do the same thing.

OK, I just created an account, but it doesn't look that the wiki is 
actually editable:

   You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
   You do not have permission to edit pages in the Handbook namespace.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Michael Orlitzky]

On 10/22/2015 04:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 20/10/15 17:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> The whole thing is confusing. If you ever get it working please put a
>> decent example on the wiki because I remember spending hours trying to
>> do the same thing.
> 
> OK, I just created an account, but it doesn't look that the wiki is 
> actually editable:
> 
>    You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
>    You do not have permission to edit pages in the Handbook namespace.
> 
> 

Some pages aren't, but most are. The exceptions are things like project
pages and the handbook (which I guess is where you got that error?). I
think this

  https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.env

is a normal page and you should be able to edit it.

Re: [gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Alexander Kapshuk]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1465 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm following the documentation here:
>
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv
>
> to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild. The docs only provide an
> actual example for the global hook case (/etc/portage/bashrc), but it says
> it works the same way on a per-ebuild basis using /etc/portage/env. But it
> is totally silent on how to actually do that :-/
>
> So I assume, since the docs don't mention anything special, that I should
> put the code in a conf file. So I created this file:
>
>   /etc/portage/env/test.conf
>
> and in it:
>
>   if [ "${EBUILD_PHASE}" == "postinst" ];
>   then
>       echo ":: TEST"
>   fi
>
> Then I added this line to /etc/portage/package.env:
>
>   app-misc/mc test.conf
>
> But when I "emerge app-misc/mc", I get:
>
> !!! Problem in 'app-misc/mc' dependencies.
> !!! "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')
> portage.exception
> ... done!
> "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')
>

According to test(1), comparing two strings for equality is done using a
single '=':
STRING1 = STRING2
              the strings are equal

Try '[ "${EBUILD_PHASE}" = postinst ]' to hush the 'invalid token' thingie.


>
> I don't get it... Can't I have a per-package bashrc or something? The docs
> are suggesting that I can, but don't tell me how.
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2369 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1812 bytes --]

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:04:10 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> I'm following the documentation here:
> 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Portage/Advanced#Using_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fenv
> 
> to hook into the postinst phase of an ebuild. The docs only provide an 
> actual example for the global hook case (/etc/portage/bashrc), but it 
> says it works the same way on a per-ebuild basis
> using /etc/portage/env. But it is totally silent on how to actually do
> that :-/
> 
> So I assume, since the docs don't mention anything special, that I 
> should put the code in a conf file. So I created this file:
> 
>    /etc/portage/env/test.conf
> 
> and in it:
> 
>    if [ "${EBUILD_PHASE}" == "postinst" ];
>    then
>        echo ":: TEST"
>    fi
> 
> Then I added this line to /etc/portage/package.env:
> 
>    app-misc/mc test.conf
> 
> But when I "emerge app-misc/mc", I get:
> 
> !!! Problem in 'app-misc/mc' dependencies.
> !!! "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=') 
> portage.exception
> ... done!
> "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')
> 
> I don't get it... Can't I have a per-package bashrc or something? The 
> docs are suggesting that I can, but don't tell me how.

I'm nut sure you can put that sort of thing in package.env, I thought it
was only for settings variables, like make.conf but per-package. You can
add function calls in /etc/portage/env/cat/pkg, for example I have
used this for a couple of packages that didn't support epatch_user

post_src_unpack() {
        cd "${S}"
        epatch_user
}

AFAIK you can do this for any of the standard ebuild functions listed in
man 5 ebuild.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 20/10/15 18:37, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:04:10 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> So I assume, since the docs don't mention anything special, that I
>> should put the code in a conf file. So I created this file:
>>
>>     /etc/portage/env/test.conf
>>
>> and in it:
>>
>>     if [ "${EBUILD_PHASE}" == "postinst" ];
>>     then
>>         echo ":: TEST"
>>     fi
>>  [...]
>>
>> But when I "emerge app-misc/mc", I get:
>>
>> !!! Problem in 'app-misc/mc' dependencies.
>> !!! "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')
>> portage.exception
>> ... done!
>> "/etc/portage/env/test.conf", line 1: Invalid token '[' (not '=')
>
> I'm nut sure you can put that sort of thing in package.env, I thought it
> was only for settings variables, like make.conf but per-package. You can
> add function calls in /etc/portage/env/cat/pkg, for example I have
> used this for a couple of packages that didn't support epatch_user
>
> post_src_unpack() {
>          cd "${S}"
>          epatch_user
> }
>
> AFAIK you can do this for any of the standard ebuild functions listed in
> man 5 ebuild.

Thanks! That works just fine.

Btw, you can put your epatch_user in /etc/portage/bashrc instead and 
have it for all packages. It is safe to have it twice even in packages 
that do support epatch_user. That function is specifically written for 
this use case, so that even when using it multiple times, the patches 
are only applied once.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How is /etc/portage/env supposed to work?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 639 bytes --]

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:32:15 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> Btw, you can put your epatch_user in /etc/portage/bashrc instead and 
> have it for all packages. It is safe to have it twice even in packages 
> that do support epatch_user. That function is specifically written for 
> this use case, so that even when using it multiple times, the patches 
> are only applied once.

That's good to know. I only set it where I knew I needed it because I was
unsure of that. However, the files are dated Feb 2012, so things have
probably improved since then.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

- We are but packets in the internet of Life-

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]